TABLE 1. Comparison Between Our Method and Several Current Segmentation Methods (Mean Value ± Standard Deviation)).
| Methods | DM | Jaccard coefficient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LV | MYO | RV | LV | MYO | RV | |
| Conv-Deconv | 0.934 ± 0.003 | 0.846 ± 0.011 | 0.881 ± 0.009 | 0.884 ± 0.064 | 0.733 ± 0.088 | 0.778 ± 0.109 |
| Seg-Net | 0.937 ± 0.009 | 0.844 ± 0.013 | 0.878 ± 0.022 | 0.885 ± 0.061 | 0.728 ± 0.088 | 0.779 ± 0.111 |
| FCN | 0.950 ± 0.004 | 0.873 ± 0.005 | 0.892 ± 0.025 | 0.907 ± 0.052 | 0.778 ± 0.078 | 0.800 ± 0.130 |
| U-net | 0.953 ± 0.016 | 0.887 ± 0.016 | 0.897 ± 0.026 | 0.919 ± 0.049 | 0.800 ± 0.072 | 0.827 ± 0.095 |
| Cardiac-DeepED* | 0.951 ± 0.008 | 0.870 ± 0.020 | 0.899 ± 0.018 | 0.912 ± 0.048 | 0.775 ± 0.080 | 0.818 ± 0.099 |
| Our method | 0.960 ± 0.008 | 0.890 ± 0.018 | 0.903 ± 0.026 | 0.923 ± 0.040 | 0.801 ± 0.068 | 0.828 ± 0.097 |
| Methods | Accurary | PPV | ||||
| LV | MYO | RV | LV | MYO | RV | |
| Conv-Deconv | 0.986 ± 0.007 | 0.965 ± 0.014 | 0.976 ± 0.010 | 0.942 ± 0.055 | 0.840 ± 0.094 | 0.883 ± 0.111 |
| Seg-Net | 0.985 ± 0.007 | 0.964 ± 0.014 | 0.976 ± 0.011 | 0.930 ± 0.065 | 0.845 ± 0.090 | 0.883 ± 0.106 |
| FCN | 0.989 ± 0.007 | 0.972 ± 0.011 | 0.979 ± 0.014 | 0.951 ± 0.049 | 0.878 ± 0.073 | 0.896 ± 0.112 |
| U-net | 0.990 ± 0.006 | 0.975 ± 0.011 | 0.982 ± 0.010 | 0.958 ± 0.048 | 0.887 ± 0.072 | 0.909 ± 0.097 |
| Cardiac-DeepED* | 0.989 ± 0.006 | 0.972 ± 0.011 | 0.981 ± 0.010 | 0.952 ± 0.051 | 0.871 ± 0.076 | 0.907 ± 0.096 |
| Our method | 0.991 ± 0.005 | 0.976 ± 0.009 | 0.982 ± 0.011 | 0.960 ± 0.040 | 0.891 ± 0.066 | 0.913 ± 0.095 |
Cardiac-DeepED* represents the our method that replaced the Fire dilated modules and D-Fire dilated modules with standard convolution layers.