Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 25;7:1900110. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2019.2900628

TABLE 1. Comparison Between Our Method and Several Current Segmentation Methods (Mean Value ± Standard Deviation)).

Methods DM Jaccard coefficient
LV MYO RV LV MYO RV
Conv-Deconv 0.934 ± 0.003 0.846 ± 0.011 0.881 ± 0.009 0.884 ± 0.064 0.733 ± 0.088 0.778 ± 0.109
Seg-Net 0.937 ± 0.009 0.844 ± 0.013 0.878 ± 0.022 0.885 ± 0.061 0.728 ± 0.088 0.779 ± 0.111
FCN 0.950 ± 0.004 0.873 ± 0.005 0.892 ± 0.025 0.907 ± 0.052 0.778 ± 0.078 0.800 ± 0.130
U-net 0.953 ± 0.016 0.887 ± 0.016 0.897 ± 0.026 0.919 ± 0.049 0.800 ± 0.072 0.827 ± 0.095
Cardiac-DeepED* 0.951 ± 0.008 0.870 ± 0.020 0.899 ± 0.018 0.912 ± 0.048 0.775 ± 0.080 0.818 ± 0.099
Our method 0.960 ± 0.008 0.890 ± 0.018 0.903 ± 0.026 0.923 ± 0.040 0.801 ± 0.068 0.828 ± 0.097
Methods Accurary PPV
LV MYO RV LV MYO RV
Conv-Deconv 0.986 ± 0.007 0.965 ± 0.014 0.976 ± 0.010 0.942 ± 0.055 0.840 ± 0.094 0.883 ± 0.111
Seg-Net 0.985 ± 0.007 0.964 ± 0.014 0.976 ± 0.011 0.930 ± 0.065 0.845 ± 0.090 0.883 ± 0.106
FCN 0.989 ± 0.007 0.972 ± 0.011 0.979 ± 0.014 0.951 ± 0.049 0.878 ± 0.073 0.896 ± 0.112
U-net 0.990 ± 0.006 0.975 ± 0.011 0.982 ± 0.010 0.958 ± 0.048 0.887 ± 0.072 0.909 ± 0.097
Cardiac-DeepED* 0.989 ± 0.006 0.972 ± 0.011 0.981 ± 0.010 0.952 ± 0.051 0.871 ± 0.076 0.907 ± 0.096
Our method 0.991 ± 0.005 0.976 ± 0.009 0.982 ± 0.011 0.960 ± 0.040 0.891 ± 0.066 0.913 ± 0.095

Cardiac-DeepED* represents the our method that replaced the Fire dilated modules and D-Fire dilated modules with standard convolution layers.