Table 1. Phenotypic characteristics of the participants.
| Characteristic | Music-performance (N = 10) | Control study (N = 10) |
|---|---|---|
| Female | 6 | 8 |
| Age | 48.3 ± 6.17; CI = 4.41 | 39.2 ± 11.31; CI = 8.09 |
| Age at commencing of music practice | 6.6 ± 1.71; CI = 1.23 | 5.7 ± 1.64; CI = 1.17 |
| Average hours of practise/day | 5.3 ± 0.82; CI = 0.59 | 4.3 ± 2.06; CI = 1.47 |
| Keyboard musicians | 0 | 3 |
| String musicians | 10 | 4 |
| Wind musicians | 0 | 3 |
| University degree (B.Mus./Diploma/Master’s) | 10 | 10 |
Note:
Participant demographic data are furnished in this table. Continuous explanatory variables—age, age at commencing of music practice and average hours of practice, are presented as the mean ± standard deviation with confidence interval (CI) at 95%. To assess the similarity of the music-performance and control participants, we performed two-sided t-tests to compare the age of commencement of musical practice, age of the participants and number of hours of musical practice per day. At 95% confidence, we did not find any significant (p < 0.05) differences in the age of commencement of musical practice, age of the participants and the number of hours of musical practice per day between music-performance and control groups. Additionally, we performed two-sided fisher’s exact test for count data to assess any statistically significant differences between the gender and music education level of the music-performance and control groups. However, at 95% confidence, we did not find any statistically significant differences in the gender of the participants between music-performance and control groups. Similarly, the education level of the performing musicians and the control group did not show any statistically significant differences from each other.