Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 3;9(3):e025356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025356

Table 2.

Caesarean section (CS) rates among groups with different insurance status

Author Year State Year of data collection CS rate of privately insured (%) CS rate of publicly insured (%) CS rate of uninsured (%)
Stafford20 1990 California 1986 26.8 22.1 19.3
Haas et al 15 A 1993 Massachusetts 1984 23.0 19.4 17.2
Haas et al 15 B 1993 Massachusetts 1987 25.9 20.8 22.4
Braveman et al 209 1995 California 1991 27.1 21.2 23.0
Burns et al 21 1995 Arizona 1989 n/a n/a n/a
Onion et al 210 A* 1999 Maine 1990–1992 15.9 14.9 13.4
Onion et al 210 B* 1999 New Hampshire 1990–1992 16.1 13.2 13.0
Onion et al 210 C* 1999 Vermont 1990–1992 14.5 13.5 9.4
Aron et al 211 2000 Ohio 1993–1995 17.0 14.2 10.7
Grant22 A 2005 All states 1988 27.0 23.7 17.1
Grant22 B 2005 Florida 1992 30.0 21.6 20.7
Coonrod et al 62 2008 Arizona 2005 26.0 19.0 20.0
Huesch212 2011 New Jersey 2004–2007 26.7 22.5 20.3
Kozhimannil et al 103 2014 All states 2002–2009 n/a n/a n/a
Huesch et al 213 2014 California 2010 13.9 10.7 13.0
Sebastião et al 214 2016 Florida 2004–2011 25.2 22.8 19.7

*The rates are adjusted as compared with the rates from other studies which are crude rates. 

Dark grey, CS rates below 10% benchmark.

Light grey, CS rates below 19% benchmark.

n/a, not applicable.