Table III.
Analytic approach | ||
---|---|---|
Robust variance estimationa on censored data | GSEM on continuous data | |
Exposure | Age differenceb | Age differenceb |
Boys (n = 6299) | ||
TTP: ≤5 mo | Ref. | Ref. |
TTP: 6–12 mo | 0.86 (−0.16; 1.88) | 0.61 (−0.06; 1.28) |
TTP: >12 mo | 0.41 (−0.82; 1.64) | 0.59 (−0.25; 1.42) |
TTP: 6–12 mo + MAR | 0.43 (−2.43; 3.28) | 0.24 (−1.65; 2.14) |
TTP: >12 mo + MAR | −0.01 (−1.28; 1.26) | 0.30 (−0.60; 1.20) |
Girls (n = 6641) | ||
TTP: ≤5 mo | Ref. | Ref. |
TTP: 6–12 mo | −0.52 (−1.53; 0.50) | −0.59 (−1.39; 0.20) |
TTP: >12 mo | −0.75 (−1.94; 0.44) | −0.51 (−1.49; 0.46) |
TTP: 6–12 mo + MAR | −0.40 (−3.58; 2.78) | −0.39 (−3.13; 2.35) |
TTP: >12 mo + MAR | −1.21 (−2.61; 0.19) | −1.04 (−2.17; 0.10) |
GSEM, generalized structural equation model; mo, months; TTP, time to pregnancy.
aRobust variance estimation using the Huber–White method.
bMean monthly differences (95% confidence interval) between exposure groups adjusted for parity, maternal age at menarche, age at delivery, pre-pregnancy body mass index, smoking during first trimester and the highest social class of the parents. Analyses included sampling and selection weights.