Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 1;14(4):e0213891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213891

Table 3. Changes in extent of recent marathon-related coverage predicts distress, startle reactivity, perceptual sensitivity, and shooting behavior.

Outcome B SE t-ratio df p Cohen’s d
Self-reported Distress
Model Intercept 9.11 0.74 12.23 90 < .001** 2.58
Model Slope -7.13 3.41 2.09 90 .039* 0.44
Startle Amplitude
Model Intercept 27.23 1.65 16.47 90 < .001* 3.47
Model Slope -43.4 14.34 3.03 90 .003** 0.64
Perceptual Sensitivity
Model Intercept 0.64 0.03 19.56 90 < .001** 4.12
Model Slope 0.51 0.2 2.58 90 .011** 0.54
Response Bias 0.39 0.08 5.12 90 < .001** 1.08
Threat Response Bias
Model Intercept 0.15 0.03 4.78 90 < .001** 1.01
Model Slope -0.41 0.17 2.45 90 .016* 0.52
P. Sensitivity 0.27 0.06 4.45 90 < .001** 0.94

Note: Model uses robust standard errors (i.e., random effects). Model coefficients (B) are unstandardized. Model Slope represents the coefficient estimates for the extent of recent marathon-related media content, which is centered around each participant’s own mean. Slopes can be interpreted as the predicted change in the outcome variable associated with a 1 unit increase in the extent of recent Marathon-related coverage. For example, a participant’s startle amplitude is predicted to be 43.40 μV lower when the likelihood of a reader seeing at least one marathon related article every day in the four newspapers assessed here is 100% than when it is 0%.

*p < .05

**p < .0125 (Bonferroni-corrected alpha)