Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 20;13(3):e0007258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007258

Table 1. Demographic and milk exposure factors associated with RVFV exposure.

Prior Exposure to RVFV
Characteristics Total Cohort
(n = 4,223)
No Infection
(n = 3,956)
Infection
(n = 267)
p value SMD
Village–n (%) <0.001 1.373
    Bodhei 206 (4.9) 170 (4.3) 36 (13.5)
    Busia 2,634 (62.4) 2,605 (65.8) 29 (10.9)
    Masalani 249 (5.9) 215 (5.4) 34 (12.7)
    Sangailu 1,134 (26.9) 966 (24.4) 168 (62.9)
Region–n (%) <0.001 1.371
    West 2643 (62.4) 2605 (65.8) 29 (10.9)
    East 1580 (47.6) 1351 (34.2) 238 (89.1)
Age–(mean (SD)) 26.03 (19.62) 25.04 (19.24) 40.70 (19.41) <0.001 0.811
        –(median (IQR)) 21.0 (9.0, 39.0) 19.0 (8.0, 87.0) 40.0 (26.5, 52.5)
Female–n (%) 2,012 (47.6) 1,870 (47.3) 142 (53.2) 0.072 0.118
Milking–n (%)*
    Any 1,470 (34.8) 1,264 (32.0) 206 (77.2) <0.001 1.024
    Cow 1,219 (28.9) 1,026 (25.9) 193 (72.3) <0.001 1.052
    Sheep or Goat** 1,000 (23.7) 799 (20.2) 201 (75.3) <0.001 1.267
    Camel 9 (0.2) 8 (0.2) 1 (0.4) 1 0.022
Raw Milk Consumption–n (%)*
    Any 1,551(36.7) 1,320 (33.4) 231 (86.5) <0.001 1.273
    Cow 1,491 (35.3) 1,267 (32.0) 224 (83.9) <0.001 1.236
    Sheep 1,502 (35.6) 1,275 (32.2) 227 (85.0) <0.001 1.266
    Goat 1,502 (35.6) 1,274 (32.2) 228 (85.4) <0.001 1.287
    Camel 19 (0.4) 16 (0.4) 3 (1.1) 0.237 0.082

* = the following milk types are not mutually exclusive.

** = sheep or goats were conflated into a category described as “shoats” in the questionnaires administered to participants in Busia, but sheep and goats were referred to separately in questionnaires utilized in all other regions. Therefore, all respondents reporting milking behavior with “shoats”, “sheep”, or “goats” were included in an inclusive category of “sheep or goats” for the purpose of this analysis. IQR = interquartile range; 25th and 75th percentile. Percentages may include missing values in each category.