Table 2.

Hierarchical Multiple Regression of Mentor Support for Ethnic/Racial Identity (ERI) at Time 2 Predicting Mentoring Relationship Quality at Time 3 (N=36)

	Mentoring Relationship Quality: Relational Satisfaction T3
Predictor	B	SE B	β	ΔR2	ΔF
Block 1				.16	3.04
Relational Satisfaction T2	.43	.20	.35*
Group (Intervention vs. Control)	.22	.23	.16
Block 2				.16	3.63*
Relational Satisfaction T2	.24	.20	.19
Group (Intervention vs. Control)	.15	.22	.10
Mentor Support for ERI T2	.36	.14	.42*
Mentor Race	.09	.22	.06
Block 3				.03	1.33
Relational Satisfaction T2	.22	.20	.18
Group (Intervention vs. Control)	.25	.23	.17
Mentor Support for ERI T2	.21	.19	.24
Mentor Race	−.69	.71	−.48
Mentor Support for ERI × Mentor Race	.32	.28	.62
	Mentoring Relationship Quality: Instrumental Satisfaction T3
Block 1				.42	12.01**
Instrumental Satisfaction T2	.60	.15	.56**
Group (Intervention vs. Control)	.36	.24	.21
Block 2				.05	1.35
Instrumental Satisfaction T2	.53	.16	.49**
Group (Intervention vs. Control)	.36	.24	.21
Mentor Support for ERI T2	.24	.15	.23
Mentor Race	−.10	.24	−.06
Block 3				.00	.09
Instrumental Satisfaction T2	.53	.16	.49**
Group (Intervention vs. Control)	.39	.27	.22
Mentor Support for ERI T2	.20	.21	.19
Mentor Race	−.32	.79	−.18
Mentor Support for ERI × Mentor Race	.09	.31	.14

^**p<.01;

^*p<.05;

ERI – Ethnic/Racial identity; Mentor Race (White vs. Woman of Color)