Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2018 Oct 1;25(4):505–514. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000213

Table 4.

Hierarchical Multiple Regression of Cultural Mistrust Predicting Mentoring Relationship Quality and Mentor Support for Ethnic/Racial Identity (ERI) Among Girls with White Mentors (n=21)

Mentoring Relationship Quality: Relational Satisfaction T3
Predictor B SE B β ΔR2 ΔF
Block 1 .28 3.38
 Relational Satisfaction T2 .49 .29 .36
 Group (Intervention vs. Control) .57 .31 .39
Block 2 .06 1.10
 Relational Satisfaction T2 .44 .28 .33
 Group (Intervention vs. Control)  .51 .31 .34
 Cultural Mistrust T1 −.42 .35 −.25
Mentoring Relationship Quality: Instrumental Satisfaction T3
Block 1 .56 10.94**
 Instrumental Satisfaction T2 .72 .20 .63**
 Group (Intervention vs. Control) .41 .33 .22
Block 2 .11 5.16*
 Instrumental Satisfaction T2 .63 .18 .56**
 Group (Intervention vs. Control) .37 .30 .20
 Cultural Mistrust T1 −.73 .32 −.34*
Mentor Support for ERI T3
Block 1 .43 6.49**
 Mentor Support for ERI T2 .51 .30 .51*
 Group (Intervention vs. Control) .38 .33 .25
Block 2 .09 3.12
 Mentor Support for ERI T2 .26 .24 .26
 Group (Intervention vs. Control) .47 .31 .29
 Cultural Mistrust T1 −.71 .40 −.39
**

p<.01;

*

p<.05;

p<.10;

T1: baseline; T2: 3 months after baseline; T3: one year after baseline