Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 1;38(2):106–124. doi: 10.14366/usg.18037

Table 1.

The main studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of elastography in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules

Study No. of studies/centers No. of nodules/patients Type of design Malignant proportion (%) Type Cut-offs Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) AUROC (%)
Moon et al. [36], 2012 1 703/676 Retrospective 30.8 ES Score 3-4 15.7 95.3 -
Score 2-3 65.4 58.2 -
Unluturk et al. [40], 2012 1 237/194 Prospective 25 ES Score 2-3 47 80 72
SR > 2.1 69 67 72
Ghajarzadeh et al. [41], 2014 12 1,180 Meta-analysis 30.8 ES Score 2-3 86 66.7 87.7
Razavi et al. [38], 2013 24 3,531/2,624 Meta-analysis 32.8 ES - 82 82 89
33.2 SR - 89 82 93
Sun et al. [35], 2014 31 5,481/4,468 Meta-analysis 5.0-63.0 ES - 79 77 89
1,063/983 SR - 85 80 93
Friedrich-Rust et al. [33], 2016 7 657/602 Prospective, multicenter 13.7 ES Score 2-3 69 75 -
SR ≥2.66 58 78 -
Bojunga et al. [22], 2012 1 158/138 - 13.3 pSWE ≥2.57 m/sec 57 85 69
Liu et al. [32], 2015 13 1,854/1,641 Meta-analysis 13.3-45.1 pSWE ≥2.01-2.91 m/s 81 84 91
Dong et al. [42], 2015 13 1,617/1,451 Meta-analysis 30.6 pSWE - 86 90 94
Xu et al. [19], 2014 1 183/159 Prospective 36.1 pSWE ≥2.87 m/sec 71.6 83.4 86
ARFI imaging Grade III-IV 80 93.8 91
Lin et al. [34], 2014 15 1,867/1,525 Meta-analysis 28.5 pSWE + 2-D SWE - 84 88 93
Zhan et al. [43], 2015 16 2,456/2,147 Meta-analysis 30.6 pSWE + 2-D SWE ≥2.01-3.10 m/sec 80 85 91
Sebag et al. [3], 2010 1 146/93 Prospective 19.9 2-D SWE Emax ≥65 kPa 85.2 93.9 93.6
Veyrieres et al. [44], 2012 1 151/148 - 11.8 2-D SWE Emax ≥66 kPa 80 90.5 85.2
Liu et al. [28], 2014 1 64/49 Prospective 29.7 2-D SWE Emean ≥38.3 kPa 68 87 84
Park et al. [27], 2015 1 476/453 Retrospective 79.6 2-D SWE Emean ≥85 kPa 43.6 88.7 68.9
Emax ≥94 kPa 46.4 85.6 68.4
Azizi et al. [45], 2015 1 707/676 Prospective 11.6 2-D SWE SWSmax ≥3.54 m/sec 79.3 71.5 78
Zhou et al. [23], 2017 1 302/290 Prospective 21.5 2-D SWE SWSmean ≥2.60 m/sec 84.6 70.0 89.1
Kim et al. [46], 2013 1 99/99 Retrospective 21.2 2-D SWE Emax ≥65 kPa 76.1 64.1 75.9
Emin ≥53 kPa 61.9 76.1 69.5
Emean ≥62 kPa 66.6 71.6 76.8
Dobruch-Sobczak et al. [39], 2016 2 169/119 Prospective, dual-center 29.6 2-D SWE Emax ≥67 kPa 42.0 88.2 -
Hu et al. [37], 2017 10 - Meta-analysis 17.8 2-D SWE - 79 87 83
Zhao et al. [31], 2018 1 176/176 Prospective 35.8 2-D SWE Emax ≥49.5 kPa 74.6 82.3 83.6
3-D SWE ESD ≥13 kPa 74.6 88.5 83.9

AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; ES, elasticity score; SR, strain ratio; pSWE, point shear-wave elastography; ARFI imaging, acoustic radiation force impulse imaging; 2-D SWE, 2-dimensional shear-wave elastography; 3-D SWE, 3-dimensional shear-wave elastography.