Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 26;10:645. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00645

Table 6.

Differences in congruence coefficients with population components between GPR-Varimax and SPSS-Varimax for double-optimum simple structure.

25 iterations
250 iterations
GPR start No With No With
k N loadings Kaiser Kaiser Kaiser Kaiser
3 100 Unrotated 0.001 0.001
Random 1 0.017 0.017
Random 10 0.017 0.017
300 Unrotated 0.001 0.002
Random 1 0.001 0.027 0.029
Random 10 0.036 0.030
6 100 Unrotated
Random 1 0.001
Random 10 0.001
300 Unrotated
Random 1 0.016 0.030
Random 10 0.023 0.032
9 100 Unrotated -0.001 -0.001
Random 1 -0.001 -0.001
Random 10 -0.001 -0.001
300 Unrotated -0.001 -0.001
Random 1 -0.001 0.027 -0.001 0.026
Random 10 0.034 0.028
12 100 Unrotated -0.001 -0.001 0.001
Random 1 -0.001 -0.001 0.001
Random 10 -0.001 -0.001 0.001
300 Unrotated
Random 1 0.026 0.027
Random 10 0.031 0.029

GPR, gradient-projection based rotation. k, number of components. With Kaiser, loadings were Kaiser normalized before rotation. No Kaiser, non-normalized loadings. Differences refer to the mean congruence coefficients with population components of 1,000 samples and were computed as GPR-mean – SPSS-mean. Differences of |Δ|≥ 0.001 are reported, otherwise results are considered equal (“—”). A positive sign means that GPR-Varimax was better than SPSS-Varimax and vice versa.