Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 26;13:89. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00089

Table 3a.

Data acquisition parameters.

Study # References fMRI data acquisition parameters Quality control measures Physiological measurements
Scanner In-plane resolution (mm2) Slice thickness (mm) Flip angle Parallel imaging reconstruction techniques Repetition Time (TR) (ms) Echo time (TE) (ms) Section orientation Heart rate monitoring Respiratory rate monitoring
1 Brühl et al., 2014 3T 3 × 3 3 N.a. SENSE R = 2 2,000 25 axial Verbal questioning; checked for excessive head movements No No
2 Hellrung et al., 2018 3T 3 × 3 2.6 90° N.a. 2,000 25 axial (AC-PC orientation) No No No
3 Johnston et al., 2010 3T 2 × 2 3 N.a. N.a. 2,000 30 N.a. N.a. N.a. N.a.
4 Koush et al., 2015 3T 1.8 × 1.8 1.8 70° GRAPPA, iPAT = 3 1,100 30 N.a. N.a. Yes Yes
5 Li et al., 2016 3T 3.4375 × 3.4375 (*) 3.5 80° N.a. 2,000 30 N.a. Checked for excessive head movements N.a. N.a.
6 Lorenzetti et al., 2018 3T 3.75 × 3.75 3.75 90° SENSE R = 1.5 2,000 22 N.a. Self-reports of tiredness and focus No No
7 Marxen et al., 2016 3T 4 × 4 3.2 82° GRAPPA, iPAT = 3 2,540 8.6, 18.3, 28, 38, 48, 57a near-axial (axial tilted toward coronal) N.a. Yes Yes
8 Nicholson et al., 2017 3T 3 × 3 3 80° N.a. 2,000 30 near-axial (slices tilted–20° from AC-PC orientation Participants'heads were stabilized N.a. N.a.
9 Paret et al., 2014 3T N.a. (**) 3 80° N.a. 2,000 30 axial (AC-PC orientation) Eye-Tracking N.a. N.a.
10 Paret et al., 2016 3T 3 × 3 3 80° N.a. 2,000 30 near-axial (slices tilted–20° from AC-PC orientation) Eye-Tracking N.a. N.a.
11 Paret et al., 2018 3T 3 × 3 3 60° GRAPPA 1,000 30 near-axial (slices tilted−20° from AC-PC orientation) Eye-Tracking No No
12 Posse et al., 2003a 1.5T 6.25 × 6.25 3 30° N.a. 1,000 12–140a axial or near-axial (AC-PC orientation) No Yes Yes
13 Sarkheil et al., 2015 3T 3 × 3 2.5 90° N.a. 1,500 30 axial N.a. N.a. N.a.
14 Young et al., 2014 3T 1.875 × 1.875 2.9 90° SENSE R = 2 2,000 30 axial N.a. Yes Yes
15 Young et al., 2017 3T 1.875 × 1.875 2.9 90° SENSE R = 2 2,000 30 axial No Yes Yes
16 Zotev et al., 2011 3T 1.875 × 1.875 2.9 90° SENSE R = 2 2,000 30 axial N.a. Yes Yes
17 Zotev et al., 2014 3T 3.75 × 3.75 2.9 90° SENSE R = 2 2,000 30 axial N.a. Yes Yes
18 Zotev et al., 2016 3T 1.875 × 1.875 2.9 90° SENSE R = 2 2,000 30 axial N.a. Yes Yes
19 Zotev et al., 2018 3T 1.875 × 1.875 2.9 90° SENSE R = 2 2,000 30 axial No Yes Yes

Information regarding fMRI data acquisition.

a

The study used multi-echo acquisition to optimize BOLD sequence; AC, anterior commissure; N.a., No information available; N.c., Not clear; SENSE, Sensitivity Encoding (SENSE acceleration factor)—enhancing the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by means of arrays of multiple receiver coils through sensitivity encoding (Pruessmann et al., 1999); R, acceleration factor (or reduction factor); GRAPPA, generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions; iPAT, Integrated Parallel Acquisition Techniques (the iPAT number refers to the image acceleration factor or reduction in the length of the echo train); PC, posterior commissure; (*) in-plane resolution was computed using the formula Field-of-View/Acquisition Matrix; (**) only Field-of-View is reported: 192 × 192, not acquisition matrix nor direct in-plane resolution.