Table 1.
This table shows the 3 levels in the building process of a clinical decision support system and some examples of where clinical expert knowledge of health care professionals plays a role in each of these levels.
Level and example of issue | Example of expert knowledge | |
Data level | ||
|
Laboratory thresholds | Hemoglobin reference range to diagnose anemia |
Derived measurementsa | Body mass index | |
Diagnostic codes | Grouping of related diagnoses in a study population | |
Jargon | Same abbreviations having different meanings | |
Temporality | Glucose values are highly dependent on the time of day (eg, pre- or postprandial) | |
Algorithm level | ||
|
Methodological choices | How to handle missing data (eg, missing not at random) |
Feature engineeringa | Constructing relevant derived variables from raw data (eg, torsades de pointes, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) | |
|
Artifacts | For example, oxygen saturation of zero caused by a slipping pulse oximeter, switched leads in an electrocardiogram |
Decision support level | ||
|
Interpretation of model output | Risk probability of 0.75 requires a warning (amber light) in a CDSb system |
Degree of autonomy | Tuning of implantable cardioverter defibrillator | |
Knowledge on usefulness | Weighing a CDS system’s advice to treat while considering quality of life versus treatment burden in elderly cancer patients in a shared decision-making context |
aDerived measurements may occur at the data level but also at the algorithm level; the former being undesirable because any manipulation at the data level may result in a loss of information.
bCDS: clinical decision support.