Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 1;7:52. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0670-1

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

The ability to correctly classify metagenomic fragments for fARGene and five competing methods. The performance of fARGene was consistently higher than all compared methods (in average, 87% compared to 55%, 7.5%, 52%, 42%, 46%, and 0%, for deepARG, Resfams, MEGAN SEED, MEGAN eggNOG, ARGs-OAP, and GROOT, respectively)