Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 25;4(6):433–442. doi: 10.1159/000335135

Table 4.

Analysis of variance and post hoc comparisons of processes of change scores across stages of change

PC, C, Prep, A, M, F (4, 706) f Tukey comparisons
mean (SD) mean (SD) mean (SD) mean (SD) mean (SD)
1. EmR 24.65 57.03 65.06 67.52 58.63 184.85** 0.87 PC < C*** Prep*** A*** M***
(15.68) (17.98) (16.76) (16.02) (22.27) C < A***
M < A***

2. WMA 22.02 36.05 38.75 52.89 49.78 93.92** 0.62 PC < C*** Prep*** A*** M***
(17.58) (15.86) (16.40) (15.27) (20.84) C < A*, M***
Prep < A***, M**

3. EnR 13.22 26.87 27.83 36.49 33.78 47.15** 0.43 PC < C*** Prep*** A*** M***
(14.47) (18.02) (20.77) (20.09) (23.45) C < A**, M*
Prep < A*

4. WCE 6.71 29.15 34.64 45.45 36.55 90.44** 0.60 PC < C*** Prep*** A*** M***
(10.98) (23.79) (28.33) (24.92) (27.58) C < A***, M*
Prep < A*
M < A*

EmR = Emotional re-evaluation; WMA = weight management actions; EnR = environmental restructuring; WCE = weight consequences evaluation; PC = pre-contemplation; C = contemplation; Prep = preparation; A = action; M = maintenance.

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001.