Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan-Feb;51(1):11–16. doi: 10.4103/ijp.IJP_536_18

Table 1.

ARRIVE checklist for title (item number 1), abstract (item number 2), introduction (item number 3), objectives (item number 4), and methods (item number 5 and 6)

Item Number Recommendation Yes (%) No (%) 95% CI
Title 1 Provide as accurate and concise a description of the content of the article as possible 161 (100) 0
Abstract 2 Provide an accurate summary of the background, research objectives (including details of the species or strain of animal used), key methods, principal findings, and conclusions of the study 161 (100) 0 1 (0.97-1)
Introduction
Background 3 (a) Include sufficient scientific background (including relevant references to previous work) to understand the motivation and context for the study, and explain the experimental approach and rationale 161 (100) 0 1 (0.97-1)
(b) Explain how and why the animal species and model being used can address the scientific objectives and, where appropriate, the study’s relevance to human biology 33 (20.50) 128 (79.50) 0.20 (0.14-0.27)
Objectives 4 Clearly describe the primary and any secondary objectives of the study, or specific hypotheses being tested 161 (100) 0 1 (0.97-1)
Methods
Ethical statement 5 Indicate the nature of the ethical review permissions, relevant licenses (e.g., animal [scientific procedures] act 1986), and national or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals, that cover the research 145 (90.06) 16 (9.94) 0.90 (0.84-0.93)
Study design 6 For each experiment, give brief details of the study design, including
(a) The number of experimental and control groups 161 (100) 0 1 (0.97-1)
(b) Any steps taken to minimize the effects of subjective bias when allocating animals to treatment (e.g., randomization procedure) 73 (45.34) 88 (54.66) 0.45 (0.37-0.53)
(c) When assessing results (e.g., if done, describe who was blinded) 18 (11.18) 143 (88.82) 0.11 (0.07-0.16)
(d) The experimental unit (e.g., a single animal, group, or cage of animals) A timeline diagram or flow chart can be useful to illustrate how complex study designs were carried out 161 (100) 0 1 (0.97-1)

CI=Confidence interval