Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 2.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Biol. 2018 May 25;441(2):319–327. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.05.009

Fig. 3. Differences in stress responses between surface and cavefish are not due to differences in vision.

Fig. 3.

(A) Representative swim paths of a surface and Pachón individual during a 10-min trial in the novel tank assay done in lighted conditions (white background) or in the dark (shaded background). (B) Quantification of the total duration spent in the top half of the tank during the 10-min recording period, in lighted conditions (L) and in the dark (D). Surface (L) vs. Pachón (L): P = 0.0018. Surface (D) vs. Pachón (D): P = 0.00030. (C) Quantification of total duration spent immobile in L and in D. Surface (D) vs. Pachón (D): P = 0.0028. Data analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s posthoc: * * indicates P < 0.005; ns indicates not significant. (Surface: n = 8; Pachón: n = 7) Error bars ± s.e.m.