Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 26;10:283. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00283

Table 1.

Descriptive and comparative data between NonFall-LFOF, NonFall-HFOF, Fall-LFOF and Fall-HFOF groups.

N Mean Std. deviation Std. error 95% Confidence interval F p (ω) Paired comparison
Lower bound Upper bound A/B (r) A/C (r) A/D (r) B/C (r) B/D (r) C/D (r)
Age (years) NonFall -LFOF 12 72.50 6.04 1.74 68.66 76.34 0.411 0.746 (−0.04) - - - - - -
NonFall -HFOF 15 72.67 7.59 1.96 68.46 76.87
Fall -LFOF 12 70.83 5.59 1.61 67.28 74.38
Fall -HFOF 10 73.90 6.56 2.07 69.21 78.59
Total 49 72.43 6.44 0.92 70.58 74.28
Weight (Kg) NonFall -LFOF 12 61.61 6.37 1.84 57.56 65.66 0.694 0.560 (−0.02) - - - - - -
NonFall -HFOF 15 58.05 10.03 2.59 52.50 63.61
Fall -LFOF 12 60.53 8.73 2.52 54.98 66.07
Fall -HFOF 10 63.27 11.62 3.67 54.96 71.58
Total 49 60.59 9.23 1.32 57.94 63.24
Height (meters) NonFall -LFOF 12 1.55 0.05 0.01 1.52 1.59 0.662 0.580 (−0.02) - - - - - -
NonFall -HFOF 15 1.54 0.05 0.01 1.51 1.56
Fall -LFOF 12 1.56 0.08 0.02 1.51 1.60
Fall -HFOF 10 1.53 0.06 0.02 1.48 1.57
Total 49 1.54 0.06 0.01 1.53 1.56
BMI (kg/m2) NonFall -LFOF 12 25.57 2.65 0.77 23.88 27.25 1.006 0.399 (0.00) - - - - - -
NonFall -HFOF 15 24.67 4.53 1.17 22.16 27.18
Fall -LFOF 12 24.91 2.34 0.67 23.42 26.39
Fall -HFOF 10 27.04 3.97 1.25 24.20 29.88
Total 49 25.43 3.55 0.51 24.41 26.45
Mine mental (score) NonFall -LFOF 12 26.50 3.15 0.91 24.50 28.50 1.736 0.173 (0.04) - - - - - -
NonFall -HFOF 15 26.93 2.49 0.64 25.55 28.31
Fall -LFOF 12 25.00 3.19 0.92 22.97 27.03
Fall -HFOF 10 27.70 2.87 0.91 25.65 29.75
Total 49 26.51 2.98 0.43 25.65 27.37
FES-I (score) NonFall -LFOF 12 22.33 3.87 1.12 19.88 24.79 21.810 <0.001 (0.56) <0.001 (0.77) 0.972 (0.11) <0.001 (0.77) <0.001 (0.75) 0.701 (0.19) <0.001 (0.75)
NonFall -HFOF 15 34.27 5.87 1.52 31.01 37.52
Fall -LFOF 12 23.17 3.74 1.08 20.79 25.54
Fall -HFOF 10 32.20 4.49 1.42 28.99 35.41
Total 49 28.20 7.09 1.01 26.17 30.24

A, NonFall-LFOF; B, NonFall-HFOF; C, Fall-LFOF; D, Fall-HFOF. Comparative analysis performed by ANOVA one way, considering the F ratio, effect size (ω) and significance of α ≤ 0.05. Post Tukey post hoc analysis, considering effect size (r) and significance of α ≤ 0.05.