Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 2.
Published in final edited form as: Ergonomics. 2009 Jul;52(7):820–829. doi: 10.1080/00140130802641585

Table 3.

Inter-rater reliability for each item in posture, activity, tools and handling observations.

Item Inter-rater reliability (n = 443 observation pairs)

% agreement Kappa

Coefficient* 95% CI Classification
1. Trunk posture 74.5 0.53 0.46–0.60 Fair to good
2. Leg posture 96.3 0.94 0.91–0.97 Excellent
3. Shoulder/arm elevation 87.8 0.66 0.55–0.76 Fair to good
4. Elbow posture 79.7 0.40 0.27–0.53 Fair to good
5. Weight in hands 99.3 0.40 (–)0.15–0.94 Fair to good
6. Manual materials handling (MMH) 100 §
7. MMH action 98.8 0.37 0.01–0.73 Poor
8. Noise level 42.5 (–)0.19 (–)0.26–(–)0.11 Poor
9. Vibration 99.5 0 Poor
10. Neutral/gross grasp 72.2 0.44 0.36–0.53 Fair to good
11. Wrist/forearm deviation 74.8 0.50 0.41–0.58 Fair to good
12. Pinch grip 87.3 0.72 0.65–0.79 Fair to good
13. Keyboarding 95.9 0.83 0.75–0.91 Excellent
14. Hand/forearm contact stress 87.2 0.60 0.51–0.70 Fair to good
15. Hand/forearm vibration 100 1.0 Excellent
16. Weight in hands 98.8 0.44 0.01–0.88 Fair to good
17. Hand observed 100 1.0 Excellent
18. Hand activity level 75.3 0.65 0.58–0.71 Fair to good

Note: 95% CI and significance are shown for kappa.

*

Significance: p < 0.0001 for each kappa coefficient shown, except for vibration (no. 9, p > 0.99).

Ordinal variable for which the weighted kappa coefficient was calculated.

§

Undefined (zero in the denominator).