Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 2.
Published in final edited form as: Ergonomics. 2009 Jul;52(7):820–829. doi: 10.1080/00140130802641585

Table 5.

Comparison of inter-rater reliability between rater pairs with experienced raters in each pair (group A) and with one inexperienced rater in each pair (group B).

Item Group A (n = 185 observation pairs) Group B (n = 258 observation pairs)


% agreement Kappa % agreement Kappa


Coeff.* 95% CI Coeff.* 95% CI
1. Trunk posture 82.3 0.68 0.58–0.77 68.8 0.42 0.33–0.52
2. Leg posture 97.8 0.96 0.93–1.0 95.2 0.92 0.88–0.96
3. Shoulder/arm elevation 90.0 0.75 0.61–0.88 86.2 0.56 0.41–0.71
4. Elbow posture 77.7 0.33 0.14–0.53 81.2 0.45 0.27–0.62
5. Weight in hands 99.4 0 99.2 0.50 (–)0.1–1.0
6. Manual materials handling (MMH) 100 § 100 §
7. MMH action 98.9 0 98.8 0.50 0.1–0.90
8. Noise level 96.7 0.86 0.74–0.97 3.2 (–)0.59 (–)0.73–(–)0.46
9. Vibration 100 § 99.2 0
10. Neutral/gross grasp 74.4 0.49 0.36–0.62 70.5 0.40 0.28–0.52
11. Wrist/forearm deviation 79.1 0.59 0.47–0.70 71.6 0.43 0.32–0.55
12. Pinch grip 93.7 0.87 0.79–0.94 82.5 0.60 0.49–0.71
13. Keyboarding 98.3 0.93 0.85–1.0 94.0 0.74 0.61–0.87
14. Hand/forearm contact stress 88.4 0.59 0.43–0.75 86.3 0.61 0.49–0.73
15. Hand/forearm vibration 100 § 100 1.0
16. Weight in hands 98.3 0 99.2 0.67 0.36–0.97
17. Hand observed 100 1.0 100 1.0
18. Hand activity level 84.2 0.79 0.71–0.86 68.9 0.51 0.41–0.60

Note: 95% CI and significance are shown for kappa.

*

Significance: p < 0.0001 for each kappa coefficient shown, except for items (p > 0.99 each) such as weight in hands (no. 5 and no. 16), MMH action in group A and vibration (no. 9) in group B.

Ordinal variable for which the weighted kappa coefficient was calculated.

§

Undefined (zero in the denominator).