Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 22;40(7):2153–2173. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24514

Table 5.

Pearson's multiple correlations table between NAVS measures, aphasia severity, and lesion size

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 ASPT‐A
2 ASPT‐G 0.810 **
3 ASPT‐W 0.781 ** 0.707 **
4 SPPT total 0.750 ** 0.882 ** 0.734 **
5 SCT total 0.579 ** 0.627 ** 0.458 ** 0.760 **
6 ASPT‐2‐1 0.142 0.217 0.152 0.101 −0.096
7 ASPT‐3‐1 0.147 0.385 * 0.101 0.461 ** 0.197 0.508 **
8 SPPT‐NC‐C −0.090 −0.097 −0.224 0.033 0.076 −0.208 −0.056
9 SCT‐NC‐C 0.060 0.154 0.253* 0.187 0.113 0.037 0.095 0.273 *
10 WAB‐R AQ 0.826 ** 0.856 ** 0.804 ** 0.889 ** 0.706 ** 0.023 0.217 −0.015 0.116
11 Lesion size −0.550 ** −0.716 ** −0.579 ** −0.696 ** −0.542 ** −0.026 −0.237 −0.046 −0.135 −0.742 **

ASPT‐A = Argument Structure Production Test, Code A; ASPT‐G = Argument Structure Production Test; Code G; ASPT‐W = Argument Structure Production Test, Code W; ASPT‐2‐1 = Argument Structure Production Test, 2‐1; ASPT‐3‐1 = Argument Structure Production Test, 3‐1; NAVS = Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences; NC‐C = Noncanonical minus canonical; SCT = Sentence Comprehension Test; SPPT = Sentence Production Priming Test; WAB‐R = Western Aphasia Battery‐Revised, aphasia quotient.

*

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (uncorrected; two‐tailed); n range = 64–71 (not all participants were able to complete all NAVS tasks).

**

Correlation is significant at the 0.0009 level (p < 0.05 with Bonferroni correction; two‐tailed).