Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychooncology. 2019 Mar 13;28(4):872–879. doi: 10.1002/pon.5036

Table 1.

Clinicians’ Program Evaluations (Acceptability) at Post-Intervention

Item M(SD) N “Agree”/
“Strongly
Agree”(%)
1. It was easy for me to participate. 4.6(.54) 7(100)
2. The information was relevant to my practice. 4.3(.76) 6(86)
3. Overall, how satisfied were you with this program? 4.1(.69) 6(86)
Participating in this program…
4. Increased my understanding of common sexual concerns for women with breast cancer. 4.3(.76) 6(86)
5. Increased my understanding of women’s sexual response. 4.3(.76) 6(86)
6. Will help me to communicate with my breast cancer patients about sexual concerns. 4.1(.69) 6(86)
7. Made me more sensitive to the issues of breast cancer patients regarding sexuality. 4.1(1.2) 5(71)
8. Increased my awareness of available treatments, resources, and referral sources for patients with sexual/intimacy concerns. 4.1(.90) 5(71)
9. Will help me know how to respond when patients raise the subject of sexuality. 4.0(.82) 5(71)
10. Will make me more likely to give information to patients about sexual and intimacy-related concerns. 3.9(.38) 6(86)
11. Is likely to impact my clinical practice. 3.9(.38) 6(86)
12. Will improve the quality of care my patients receive. 3.9(.38) 6(86)
13. Will make me more likely to raise the topic of sexuality with my patients. 3.6(.54) 4(57)

Responses to this item ranged from Very Satisfied to Very Dissatisfied; the N and % of responses of “Satisfied” or “Very Satisfied” are presented