Figure A11.

Results for one sample t test and cluster‐wise inference using a CDT of p = .01, showing estimated FWE rates for 4–10 mm of smoothing and six different activity paradigms (old paradigms B1, B2, E1, E2, and new paradigms E3, E4), for SPM, FSL, AFNI, and a permutation test. These results are for a group size of 40. Each statistic map was first thresholded using a CDT of p = .01, uncorrected for multiple comparisons, and the surviving clusters were then compared to a FWE‐corrected cluster extent threshold, p FWE = .05. The estimated FWE rates are simply the number of analyses with any significant group activations divided by the number of analyses (1,000). (a) Results for Beijing data (b) results for Cambridge data (c) results for Oulu data