Table 2.
Evaluation of three research papers utilising the Paper-2-Podium Matrix
| Criteria | Paper #1 | Paper #2 | Paper #3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kasper et al. [76] Carbohydrate mouth rinse and caffeine improves high-intensity interval running capacity when carbohydrate restricted. |
Cobley et al. [77] N-Acetylcysteine’s attenuation of fatigue after repeated bouts of intermittent exercise: practical implications for tournament situations |
Gomez-Cabrera et al. [78] Effect of xanthine oxidase-generated extracellular superoxide on skeletal muscle force generation |
|
| Research context | + 1 Human participants but no mechanisms tested |
+ 1 Human participants but no mechanisms tested |
− 1 Rodent muscle given electrical muscle stimulation |
| Research participants | + 1 Recreationally active and appropriate age |
+ 1 Recreationally active and appropriate age with activity clearly defined |
− 2 Rodent study |
| Research design | + 1 Randomised, repeated measures double-blind study. Sample size commensurate with previous studies but no sample size calculations provided |
+ 2 Between-subjects pair-matched design. Sample size calculated and stated |
0 Matched group design although no sample size calculations provided |
| Dietary and exercise controls | + 1 Caffeine was restricted for 24–48 h and protein provided prior to sleep low but could be considered limited application to real-world scenario given that true glycogen depletion training protocols are unlikely to be performed prior to bed |
− 1 Diet recorded and asked to be repeated but not formally assessed and no objective data |
0 All foods provided but not documented and drug administered |
| Validity and reliability | + 1 Familiarisation trial cited and reference to reliability statistics. Exercise trial was a laboratory- based protocol consisting of exercise on a motorised treadmill |
− 1 Familiarisation trials performed and described; however, no objective reliability data provided. Exercise trial was a laboratory based protocol consisting of shuttle running |
− 1 No citation of reliability data of the force measurements and exercise lacking real- world application |
| Data analytics | + 1 Analytics reported and individual responses plotted although effect sizes not reported |
0 Analytics reported but lacked effect sizes. Lacking individual responses |
0 Analytics reported without effect sizes and no individual data |
| Feasibility of application | + 1 Cheap to implement and good chance of compliance |
0 Cheap to implement but some chance of non-compliance with the loading regime |
+ 1 Cheap to implement and good chance of compliance |
| Risk/reward | + 1 Minimal risk of anti-doping violation and sufficient safety data available although optimal dose of CHO mouth rinse unknown |
− 2 Limited availability of batch- tested product and high risk of side effects that could limit performance. Optimal dosing unknown |
-1 Limited availability of batch- tested product, optimal dose unknown, although safety data available |
| Timing of intervention | + 2 Age-appropriate and time available for dosing is considered optimal to be effective and time from major competition is sufficient to warrant testing the new strategy. |
+ 2 Age- appropriate and time available for dosing is considered optimal to be effective and time from major competition is sufficient to warrant testing the new strategy. |
+ 2 Age- appropriate and time available for dosing is considered optimal to be effective and time from major competition is sufficient to warrant testing the new strategy. |
| Total score/interpretation | + 10 An appropriate study to guide practice |
+ 2 May be an appropriate study to guide implementation, although some caution is needed |
− 2 Exercise caution when applying the data into practice |
In this scenario the papers were assessed in the context of their translational ability to adult elite athletes. When considering ‘Timing of intervention’ we have assumed that the intervention is age-appropriate, the time available for dosing is considered optimal to be effective, and that the time from major competition is sufficient to warrant testing the new strategy
CHO carbohydrate, MBI magnitude-based inference