Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 27;6(4):e204–e216. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30003-1

Table 2.

Cumulative incidence functions for competing events in patients receiving chemotherapy or stem-cell transplantation within the high and low minimal residual disease groups

Patients (%) Log-rank analysis
Gray's test
Univariate Cox regression analysis (Mantel-Byar method)
Competing risk regression
Progression-free survival (95% CI) p value Overall survival (95% CI) p value Cumulative incidence of relapse p value Progression-free survival, hazard ratio (95% CI) Overall survival Subdistribution hazard ratio
High minimal residual disease
Chemotherapy 11 (11%) 31 (11–56) 0·13 54 (28–75) 0·37 50 (16–77) 0·034 1 1 1
Stem-cell transplantation 92 (89%) 54 (34–71) .. 59 (36–75) .. 22 (14–31) .. 0·57 (0·28–1·19), p=0·13 0·69 (0·31–1·56), p=0·38 0·36 (0·16–0·83), p=0·016
Low minimal residual disease
Chemotherapy 70 (86%) 70 (57–79) 0·20 85 (74–92) 0·74 26 (16–38) 0·23 1 1 1
Stem-cell transplantation 11 (14%) 88 (39–98) .. 100 .. 13 (5–44) .. 0·29 (0·04–2·15), p=0·23 0·71 (0·09–5·56), p=0·74 0·32 (0·04–2·36), p=0·27

High minimal residual disease defined as ≥10−4 cells. Low minimal residual disease defined as <10−4 cells. To compare the prognostic effect of chemotherapy with stem-cell transplantation, the Mantel-Byar method was applied in which time starts at the moment of treatment initiation, and all patients begin in the non-transplantation group. Those who receive the transplant enter the transplantation group at the time of transplantation and remain there until death, second relapse, or censoring.