Table 4.
This table depicts the bias score calculated for each study based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, with 9 as the highest score.
Adeberg et al. (26) | Blumenthal et al. (25) | Han et al. (27) | Louvel et al. (28) | Nathan et al. (29) | Noel et al. (15) | Osborn et al. (30) | Pollom et al. (31) | Sun et al. (32) | Wang et al. (33) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selection (Max = 4) | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Comparability (Max = 2) | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Outcome (Max = 3) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Total (Max = 9) | 7 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 |
A higher score correlates with a lower risk of bias. Factors included for comparability include Karnofsky Performance Status and extent of resection.