Table 1.
Project type | Project number (%, AR)a |
Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | 2012 | 2014 | 2016 | 2018 | ||
Project A: hospital as the single training institution | 43 (36.2%, 0.6) | 31 (34.0%, 0.0) | 47 (30.7%, −0.9) | 61 (34.5%, 0.2) | 67 (34.4%, 0.2) | 249 (33.9%) |
Project B: clinic as the single training institution | 28 (23.5%, −4.4) | 23 (25.3%, −3.4) | 75 (49.0%, 2.0) | 85 (48.0%, 1.9) | 96 (49.2%, 2.5) | 307 (41.8%) |
Project C: hospital as the main training institution in the joint training group | 25 (21.0%, 4.0) | 23 (25.3%, 4.9) | 13 (8.5%, −1.0) | 9 (5.1%, −2.7) | 8 (4.1%, −3.4) | 78 (10.6%) |
Project D: clinic as the main training institution in the joint training group | 23 (19.3%, 1.9) | 14 (15.4%, 0.5) | 18 (11.8%, −0.8) | 22 (12.4%, −0.6) | 24 (12.3%, −0.7) | 101 (13.7%) |
Total | 119 (100%) | 91 (100%) | 153 (100%) | 177 (100%) | 195 (100%) | 735 (100%) |
Pearson's chi-square analyses were used to determine whether there was a significant increase in the project number (AR value ≧ 2) or a significant decrease in the project number (AR value ≦ −2) in a specific year.