Table 4.
The number, percentage, and adjusted residual (AR) value of the collaborating training institutions in four different regions of Taiwan from 2010 to 2018.
| Taiwan region | Collaborating training institution number (%, AR)a |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 2012 | 2014 | 2016 | 2018 | ||
| Northern | 88 (42.3%, −2.9) | 114 (51.6%, 0.0) | 155 (51.0%, −0.2) | 183 (55.0%, 1.4) | 218 (54.1%, 1.2) | 758 (51.6%) |
| Central | 46 (22.1%, −0.3) | 55 (24.9%, 0.7) | 80 (26.3%, 1.5) | 70 (21.0%, −1.0) | 87 (21.6%, −0.8) | 338 (23.0%) |
| Southern | 69 (33.2%, 3.7) | 48 (21.7%, −0.5) | 61 (20.1%, −1.4) | 75 (22.5%, −0.3) | 87 (21.6%, −0.9) | 340 (23.2%) |
| Eastern | 5 (2.4%, 0.2) | 4 (1.8%, −0.5) | 8 (2.6%, 0.5) | 5 (1.5%, −1.0) | 11 (2.7%, 0.8) | 33 (2.2%) |
| Total | 208 (100%) | 221 (100%) | 304 (100%) | 333 (100%) | 403 (100%) | 1469 (100%) |
a
Pearson's chi-square analyses were used to determine whether there was a significant increase in the institution number (AR value ≧ 2) or a significant decrease in the institution number (AR value ≦ −2) in a specific year.