Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 20;2019:8029863. doi: 10.1155/2019/8029863

Table 1.

Association of RANK, RANKL, and OPG SNPs with AS susceptibility in Taiwanese.

SNP Risk allele frequency Genotype frequency (%) p trend p FDR Test for the mode of inheritance unadjusted Test for the mode of inheritance adjusted for sex
p p FDR OR (95% CI) p p FDR OR (95% CI)
RANK rs1805034 CT C CC CT TT Additive 0.0814 0.122 1.11 (0.99-1.25) Additive 0.0858 0.1287 1.11 (0.99-1.26)
Case 745 (33.26%) 121 (10.8%) 503 (44.91%) 496 (44.29%) 0.0881 0.1322 CC + CT vs TT 0.0577 0.1387 1.16 (1-1.36) CC + CT vs TT 0.0651 0.0976 1.17 (0.99-1.37)
Control 881 (30.96%) 142 (9.98%) 597 (41.95%) 684 (48.07%) CC vs CT + TT 0.4963 0.5239 1.09 (0.85-1.41) CC vs CT + TT 0.4772 0.5727 1.1 (0.84-1.44)

RANKL rs7984870 CG G CC CG GG Additive 0.0407 0.0922 1.12 (1.01-1.25) Additive 0.0517 0.1274 1.12 (1-1.26)
Case 1203 (53.95%) 235 (21.08%) 557 (49.96%) 323 (28.97%) 0.0413 0.096 GG + CG vs CC 0.0694 0.1387 1.19 (0.99-1.44) GG + CG vs CC 0.0451 0.0976 1.22 (1.01-1.49)
Control 1456 (51.05%) 344 (24.12%) 708 (49.65%) 374 (26.23%) GG vs CG + CC 0.1244 0.2488 1.15 (0.96-1.37) GG vs CG + CC 0.2290 0.4616 1.12 (0.93-1.34)

RANKL rs9525641 CT T CC CT TT Additive 0.0301 0.0922 1.13 (1.01-1.26) Additive 0.0487 0.1274 1.12 (1-1.26)
Case 1204 (54.09%) 235 (21.11%) 552 (49.6%) 326 (29.29%) 0.0297 0.096 TT + CT vs CC 0.0651 0.1387 1.19 (0.99-1.44) TT + CT vs CC 0.0501 0.0976 1.22 (1-1.48)
Control 1458 (51.01%) 346 (24.21%) 708 (49.55%) 375 (26.24%) TT vs CT + CC 0.0881 0.2488 1.16 (0.98-1.39) TT vs CT + CC 0.1976 0.4616 1.13 (0.94-1.35)

RANKL rs9533155 GC C GG GC CC 0.048 0.096 Additive 0.0461 0.0922 1.12 (1-1.25) Additive 0.0637 0.1274 1.12 (0.99-1.25)
Case 1241 (55.65%) 219 (19.64%) 551 (49.42%) 345 (30.94%) CC + GC vs GG 0.1054 0.1581 1.17 (0.97-1.42) CC + GC vs GG 0.0613 0.0976 1.21 (0.99-1.48)
Control 1508 (52.84%) 318 (22.28%) 710 (49.75%) 399 (27.96%) CC vs GC + GG 0.1013 0.2488 1.15 (0.97-1.37) CC vs GC + GG 0.2308 0.4616 1.12 (0.93-1.33)

OPG rs3102735 CT C CC CT TT 0.5191 0.6229 Additive 0.5074 0.6089 1.05 (0.9-1.23) Additive 0.2826 0.3391 1.09 (0.93-1.29)
Case 328 (14.72%) 21 (1.89%) 286 (25.67%) 807 (72.44%) CC + CT vs TT 0.3413 0.393 1.09 (0.91-1.3) CC + CT vs TT 0.1699 0.2039 1.14 (0.95-1.37)
Control 400 (14.06%) 32 (2.25%) 336 (23.63%) 1054 (74.12%) CC vs CT + TT 0.5239 0.5239 0.83 (0.48-1.45) CC vs CT + TT 0.6071 0.6071 0.86 (0.48-1.53)

OPG rs2073618 CG C CC CG GG 0.7412 0.7412 Additive 0.7352 0.7352 1.02 (0.9-1.16) Additive 0.7789 0.7789 1.02 (0.89-1.17)
Case 1705 (76.53%) 659 (59.16%) 387 (34.74%) 68 (6.1%) CC + CG vs GG 0.3930 0.393 0.86 (0.62-1.21) CC + CG vs GG 0.3078 0.3078 0.83 (0.59-1.18)
Control 2177 (76.12%) 823 (57.55%) 531 (37.13%) 76 (5.31%) CC vs CG + GG 0.4161 0.5239 1.07 (0.91-1.25) CC vs CG + GG 0.4124 0.5727 1.07 (0.91-1.26)

p trend: the p value from the Cochran-Armitage trend test with 100000 permutations.