Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 20;2019:8029863. doi: 10.1155/2019/8029863

Table 2.

Association of RANK, RANKL, and OPG SNPs with syndesmophyte formation in Taiwanese AS patients.

SNP Risk allele frequency Genotype frequency (%) p trend p FDR Test for the mode of inheritance unadjusted Test for the mode of inheritance adjusted for sex
p p FDR OR (95% CI) p p FDR OR (95% CI)
RANK rs1805034 CT T CC CT TT Additive 0.4892 0.7257 1.07 (0.89-1.27) Additive 0.4265 0.5118 1.08 (0.9-1.29)
Syndesmophyte+ 655 (67.53%) 53 (10.93%) 209 (43.09%) 223 (45.98%) 0.4908 0.7362 TT + CT vs CC 0.9067 0.9067 0.98 (0.67-1.43) TT + CT vs CC 0.9552 0.9552 1.01 (0.69-1.49)
Syndesmophyte- 840 (66.14%) 68 (10.71%) 294 (46.3%) 273 (42.99%) TT vs CT + CC 0.3187 0.4781 1.13 (0.89-1.43) TT vs CT + CC 0.3042 0.4564 1.14 (0.89-1.45)
C CC CT TT Additive 0.3831 0.5746 1.07 (0.92-1.25) Additive 0.2630 0.3946 1.1 (0.93-1.3)
Syndesmophyte+ 315 (32.47%) 53 (10.93%) 209 (43.09%) 223 (45.98%) 0.4009 0.6014 CC + CT vs TT 0.4265 0.6398 1.09 (0.89-1.34) CC + CT vs TT 0.3437 0.4173 1.11 (0.89-1.38)
Normal 881 (30.96%) 142 (9.98%) 597 (41.95%) 684 (48.07%) CC vs CT + TT 0.5514 0.6617 1.11 (0.79-1.54) CC vs CT + TT 0.3769 0.5557 1.18 (0.82-1.68)

RANKL rs7984870 CG G CC CG GG 0.0976 0.1952 Additive 0.0891 0.1781 1.16 (0.98-1.37) Additive 0.0724 0.1629 1.17 (0.99-1.39)
Syndesmophyte+ 542 (55.99%) 92 (19.01%) 242 (50%) 150 (30.99%) GG + CG vs CC 0.1385 0.296 1.25 (0.93-1.67) GG + CG vs CC 0.0975 0.2494 1.29 (0.96-1.74)
Syndesmophyte- 661 (52.38%) 143 (22.66%) 315 (49.92%) 173 (27.42%) GG vs CG + CC 0.1923 0.3847 1.19 (0.92-1.54) GG vs CG + CC 0.1951 0.4148 1.19 (0.91-1.56)
G CC CG GG Additive 0.0080 0.0164 1.22 (1.05-1.41) Additive 0.0141 0.0351 1.21 (1.04-1.42)
Syndesmophyte+ 542 (55.99%) 92 (19.01%) 242 (50%) 150 (30.99%) 0.0083 0.022 GG + CG vs CC 0.0209 0.0563 1.35 (1.05-1.75) GG + CG vs CC 0.0120 0.0325 1.42 (1.08-1.86)
Normal 1456 (51.05%) 344 (24.12%) 708 (49.65%) 374 (26.23%) GG vs CG + CC 0.0426 0.0852 1.26 (1.01-1.58) GG vs CG + CC 0.1222 0.2468 1.21 (0.95-1.54)

RANKL rs9525641 CT T CC CT TT Additive 0.0776 0.1781 1.16 (0.98-1.38) Additive 0.0814 0.1629 1.17 (0.98-1.39)
Syndesmophyte+ 542 (56.22%) 92 (19.09%) 238 (49.38%) 152 (31.54%) 0.074 0.1952 TT + CT vs CC 0.1480 0.296 1.24 (0.93-1.66) TT + CT vs CC 0.1247 0.2494 1.27 (0.94-1.71)
Syndesmophyte- 662 (52.46%) 143 (22.66%) 314 (49.76%) 174 (27.58%) TT vs CT + CC 0.1506 0.3847 1.21 (0.93-1.57) TT vs CT + CC 0.1851 0.4148 1.2 (0.92-1.56)
T CC CT TT Additive 0.0054 0.0164 1.23 (1.06-1.43) Additive 0.0118 0.0351 1.22 (1.05-1.42)
Syndesmophyte+ 542 (56.22%) 92 (19.09%) 238 (49.38%) 152 (31.54%) 0.0064 0.022 TT + CT vs CC 0.0209 0.0563 1.35 (1.05-1.75) TT + CT vs CC 0.0141 0.0325 1.4 (1.07-1.84)
Normal 1458 (51.01%) 346 (24.21%) 708 (49.55%) 375 (26.24%) TT vs CT + CC 0.0247 0.0852 1.29 (1.03-1.62) TT vs CT + CC 0.0888 0.2468 1.23 (0.97-1.56)

RANKL rs9533155 GC C GG GC CC 0.0825 0.1952 Additive 0.0809 0.1781 1.16 (0.98-1.38) Additive 0.0675 0.1629 1.18 (0.99-1.4)
Syndesmophyte+ 559 (57.75%) 85 (17.56%) 239 (49.38%) 160 (33.06%) CC + GC vs GG 0.1264 0.296 1.27 (0.94-1.71) CC + GC vs GG 0.0772 0.2494 1.32 (0.97-1.8)
Syndesmophyte- 682 (54.04%) 134 (21.24%) 312 (49.45%) 185 (29.32%) CC vs GC + GG 0.1808 0.3847 1.19 (0.92-1.53) CC vs GC + GG 0.2074 0.4148 1.18 (0.91-1.54)
C GG GC CC Additive 0.0082 0.0164 1.22 (1.05-1.41) Additive 0.0175 0.0351 1.21 (1.03-1.41)
Syndesmophyte+ 559 (57.75%) 85 (17.56%) 239 (49.38%) 160 (33.06%) 0.011 0.022 CC + GC vs GG 0.0282 0.0563 1.35 (1.03-1.75) CC + GC vs GG 0.0163 0.0325 1.41 (1.07-1.86)
Normal 1508 (52.84%) 318 (22.28%) 710 (49.75%) 399 (27.96%) CC vs GC + GG 0.0334 0.0852 1.27 (1.02-1.59) CC vs GC + GG 0.1234 0.2468 1.2 (0.95-1.52)

OPG rs3102735 CT T CC CT TT 0.8545 0.8545 Additive 0.8152 0.8152 1.03 (0.81-1.31) Additive 0.9277 0.9277 0.99 (0.77-1.26)
Syndesmophyte+ 824 (85.48%) 12 (2.49%) 116 (24.07%) 354 (73.44%) TT + CT vs CC 0.2008 0.3012 0.57 (0.24-1.35) TT + CT vs CC 0.1698 0.2546 0.53 (0.21-1.31)
Syndesmophyte- 1076 (85.13%) 9 (1.42%) 170 (26.9%) 453 (71.68%) TT vs CT + CC 0.5145 0.6174 1.09 (0.84-1.42) TT vs CT + CC 0.7467 0.7467 1.05 (0.8-1.37)
C CC CT TT Additive 0.7260 0.726 1.04 (0.85-1.27) Additive 0.4985 0.5982 1.08 (0.87-1.34)
Syndesmophyte+ 140 (14.52%) 12 (2.49%) 116 (24.07%) 354 (73.44%) 0.7497 0.7497 CC + CT vs TT 0.7689 0.7689 1.04 (0.82-1.31) CC + CT vs TT 0.5220 0.522 1.09 (0.85-1.39)
Normal 400 (14.06%) 32 (2.25%) 336 (23.63%) 1054 (74.12%) CC vs CT + TT 0.7626 0.7626 1.11 (0.57-2.16) CC vs CT + TT 0.7035 0.7035 1.15 (0.56-2.36)

OPG rs2073618 CG C CC CG GG 0.6146 0.7375 Additive 0.6048 0.7257 1.05 (0.87-1.28) Additive 0.3549 0.5118 1.1 (0.9-1.34)
Syndesmophyte+ 746 (77.07%) 290 (59.92%) 166 (34.3%) 28 (5.79%) CC + CG vs GG 0.6986 0.8383 1.1 (0.67-1.81) CC + CG vs GG 0.4582 0.5498 1.21 (0.73-2)
Syndesmophyte- 959 (76.11%) 369 (58.57%) 221 (35.08%) 40 (6.35%) CC vs CG + GG 0.6508 0.6508 1.06 (0.83-1.34) CC vs CG + GG 0.4325 0.519 1.1 (0.86-1.41)
C CC CG GG Additive 0.5471 0.6565 1.05 (0.89-1.25) Additive 0.7931 0.7931 1.03 (0.85-1.23)
Syndesmophyte+ 746 (77.07%) 290 (59.92%) 166 (34.3%) 28 (5.79%) 0.5674 0.6809 CC + CG vs GG 0.6932 0.7689 0.91 (0.59-1.42) CC + CG vs GG 0.3477 0.4173 0.79 (0.49-1.28)
Normal 2177 (76.12%) 823 (57.55%) 531 (37.13%) 76 (5.31%) CC vs CG + GG 0.3621 0.5431 1.1 (0.89-1.36) CC vs CG + GG 0.4631 0.5557 1.09 (0.87-1.36)

p trend: the p value from the Cochran-Armitage trend test with 100000 permutations.