Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 20;7(3):e11082. doi: 10.2196/11082

Table 4.

Results of the difference-in-difference charge analysis for with and without chronic condition cohorts showing only the difference-in-difference statistic. The regression included the following variables: age, sex, HCC score, time, case, and time*case (which represents the difference-in-difference statistic after adjusting for the other variables). Where P<.10 for the natural log of the charge categories, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and the P value and coefficient (β) for non–log-transformed charges are provided; if P≥.10, cells are left blank. Neither the with nor the without chronic condition cohort had difference-in-difference statistics that were P<.10 for acute care.

Type of charge Chronic condition Without chronic condition
β LNa charge 95% CI P value βb charge $ β LN charge 95% CI P value β charge $
Acute care
ERc care –0.2 –0.422 to 0.022 0.08 –56
Outpatient –0.43 –0.868 to 0.004 0.05 –1679
Total –0.44 –0.884 to 0.009 0.06 –1590

aLN: natural log.

bCoefficient for non–log-transformed charges.

cER: emergency room.