Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Immunol. 2019 Feb 6;80(4):228–236. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2019.01.009

Table 4.

Scoring results analysis per laboratory

Report PAN EL (n) alleles per panel TOTAL
alleles tested (n)
Identical/ Concorda nt Ambiguous Concordant (result and/or reference) Combin ed: Identical concord ant Ambiguo us Unresolv ed Null Discord ant
1 PT1 423 377 78.2% 16.2% 94.4% 0.0% 5.6%
2 409 83.6% 13.4% 97.1% 0.0% 2.9%
3 328 77.1% 16.5% 93.6% 0.0% 6.4%
4 327 86.9% 13.1% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
5 288 87.2% 10.8% 97.9% 0.0% 2.1%
6 423 83.9% 14.9% 98.8% 0.2% 0.9%
7 423 85.1% 12.8% 97.9% 0.0% 2.1%
8 423 85.6% 14.4% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
9 327 87.5% 11.3% 98.8% 0.0% 1.2%
10 423 80.9% 18.9% 99.8% 0.2% 0.0%
11 423 90.5% 9.0% 99.5% 0.0% 0.5%
12 423 89.4% 8.5% 97.9% 0.0% 2.1%
13 423 90.3% 9.5% 99.8% 0.0% 0.2%
14 PT2 406 314 86.3% 13.7% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
15 368 75.0% 24.2% 99.2% 0.3% 0.5%
16 230 87.0% 11.3% 98.3% 0.0% 1.7%
17 406 90.1% 8.6% 98.8% 0.0% 1.2%
18 406 77.3% 21.9% 99.3% 0.0% 0.7%
19 314 90.4% 10.2% 100.6% 0.0% 0.0%
20 PT3 408 408 83.3% 13.0% 96.3% 0.0% 3.7%
21 408 89.2% 10.5% 99.8% 0.0% 0.2%
22 372 79.3% 13.2% 92.5% 0.0% 7.5%
23 230 81.7% 14.8% 96.5% 0.9% 2.6%
24 PT4 392 392 90.6% 9.4% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
25 299 60.2% 29.1% 89.3% 4.7% 6.0%
26 392 90.3% 8.9% 99.2% 0.0% 0.8%
27 383 87.5% 9.1% 96.6% 0.0% 3.4%
28 359 64.6% 13.1% 77.7% 1.1% 21.2%
29 352 79.5% 20.2% 99.7% 0.0% 0.3%
30 220 80.0% 15.5% 95.5% 0.0% 4.5%
31 392 88.8% 11.2% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
32 392 88.5% 11.0% 99.5% 0.0% 0.5%
33 264 92.0% 8.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
34 Randomly selected cells 49 65.3% 34.7% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
35 137 88.3% 11.7% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
ALL 12104 84.1% 13.5% 97.5% 0.2% 2.3%

Four PT Panels (PT1 – PT4) were prepared and used for PT. One panel was distributed to each of the participating laboratories. Laboratories #34 and #35 tested only selected cells. Results scored as Identical/Concordant or Ambiguous Concordant were given a “passing” score. The Lab number in column one does not correspond to the order of lab affiliations in Table 1.