Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan 8;54(5):636–644. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.12.015

Table 1:

Studies Evaluating Outpatient Management Strategies for TIA/minor stroke

Study Type of Study Sample Size Excluded Patients Outcome Findings
Early Use of Existing Strategies for Stroke (EXPRESS)
Rothwell et al, 2007
Prospective Observational
Pre-post
1278 (644 post) -None (all TIA or stroke patients included in study) 90-day stroke risk 90-day stroke Rate of 2.1% compared to 10.3% before implementation
SOS-TIA
Lavellée, 2013
Prospective Observational 1085 -persistent symptoms
-
90-day stroke risk 90-day stroke risk of 1.24%
Ross et al. 2007 Randomized Control Trial 149 -persistent neurologic deficit
-existing condition prohibiting reliable ED testing and outpatient follow-up
90-day stroke risk, length of stay 90-day total direct costs
Return Visit
Major Clinical Event
Lower 90-day total direct costs ($890 vs $1547)
Shorter length of stay (26 v 61 hours)
12% return visits in both groups
4 major clinical events in both groups
Stead et al. 2009 Prospective Observational 418 -Patients with symptoms lasting >24 hours
-acute ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke
48-hour and 7-day stroke risk Risk of stroke of 0.96% at 48 hours and 1.2% at 7 days