. 2019 Feb 7;6(7):1801930. doi: 10.1002/advs.201801930

Table 1.

Photophysical and electrochemical data for H‐Pt, tBu‐Pt, and F‐Pt

	λ_abs ^a) [nm] (logε)	λ_em [nm] CH₂Cl₂ ^a) /film^b)	PLQY THF^a) /film^b)	τ_p [ns] CH₂Cl₂ ^a) /film^b)	HOMO/LUMO^c) [eV]
H‐Pt	248 (4.81), 284 (4.55), 369 (4.11)	484, 513/513, 620	0.54/0.24	232/247	−5.18/−2.49
tBu‐Pt	248 (4.75), 286 (4.56), 369 (4.14)	488, 518/708	0.68/0.55	218/107	−5.17/−2.50
F‐Pt	246 (4.88), 282 (4.60), 363 (4.14)	467, 496/727	0.11/0.74	266/314	−5.28/−2.56

^{^a)}

The λ_abs and λ_em were measured in CH₂Cl₂ at a concentration of 2 × 10⁻⁵ m; the PLQY was measured in degassed THF relative to fac‐[Ir(ppy)₃] (PLQY = 0.97); the τ_p was recorded in CH₂Cl₂

^{^b)}

Measured in neat films

^{^c)}

Estimated from the oxidation/reduction peak potentials.