Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 5;3(4):791–800. doi: 10.1210/js.2018-00427

Table 4.

Association between HT and Thyroid Cancer According to Primary Cytology Classification Using TBSRTC

TBSRTC Categorya HT (n = 2,651) Non-HT (n = 7,200) P Value RR 95% CI
Nondiagnostic 0.08 2.34 0.877–6.292
 Total no. 87 458
 Thyroid cancer, no. (%)b 6 (6.8) 14 (3.0)
No malignant cells <0.01 2.10 1.450–3.063
 Total no. 1602 4707
 Thyroid cancer, no. (%)b 48 (2.9) 68 (1.4)
 Indeterminate 0.05 1.19 0.999–1.436
  Total no. 696 1572
  Thyroid cancer, no. (%)b 300 (43.1) 609 (38.7)
AUS, FLUS 0.02 1.48 1.045–2.095
 Total no. 250 537
 Thyroid cancer, no. (%)b 69 (27.6) 110 (20.4)
SFN 0.50 1.11 0.808–1.538
 Total no. 235 589
 Thyroid cancer, no. (%)b 79 (33.6) 184 (31.2)
SUSP 0.71 1.07 0.745–1.541
 Total no. 211 446
 Thyroid cancer, no. (%)b 152 (72.0) 315 (70.3)
Positive for malignancy 0.39 2.32 0.258–20.907
 Total no. 265 460
 Thyroid cancer, no. (%)b 264 (99.6) 456 (99.1)

Abbreviations: AUS, atypia of undetermined significance; FLUS, follicular lesion of undetermined significance; SFN, suspicious for follicular or Hürthle cell neoplasm; SUSP, suspicious for malignancy.

a

Patients with more than one evaluable nodule were classified according to the highest TBSRTC score of the multiple nodules.

b

Thyroid cancer was defined using histopathology as well as TBSRTC 6 cytology in cases where surgery did not occur.