Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 3.
Published in final edited form as: NMR Biomed. 2018 Nov 20;32(1):e4029. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4029

TABLE 1.

Subject demographics, PFT results, and oscillation information. ND (no data) shown for two healthy volunteers, indicates that they did not undergo PFTs. SD is the standard deviation

PFTs (% predicted) Intensity RBC:barrier RBC oscillations
Subject ID Sex Age FVC (L) DLco (mL/m in/mm Hg) Amplitude (%) Chemical shift (ppm) FWHM (ppm) Phase (°)
Healthy 1 M 23 5.8 (96%) 33.9 (88%) 0.532 14.3 0.07 0.04 1.0
2 M 21 6.2 (100%) 39.2 (114%) 0.685 8.2 0.07 0.34 2.4
3 M 26 5.0 (98%) 28.8 (89%) 0.558 13.8 0.18 0.31 1.7
4 M 27 3.2 (65%) 26.5 (92%) 0.643 9.1 0.05 0.14 1.5
5 M 37 3.3 (67%) 16.8 (55%) 0.395 9.4 0.02 0.24 2.5
6 M 23 ND ND 0.789 6.8 0.15 0.13 0.9
7 M 24 6.3 (112%) 34.0 (93%) 0.530 6.3 0.08 0.16 0.4
8 F 29 ND ND 0.546 10.1 0.06 0.17 0.7
Mean 26.3 5.0 (89.7%) 29.9 (88.5%) 0.585 9.7 0.08 0.19 1.4
SD 5.0 1.4 (19.2%) 7.8 (119.0%) 0.119 2.9 0.05 0.10 0.8
IPF 11 M 56 2.1 (94%) 7.0 (26%) 0.100 24.9 1.16 0.65 19.8
12 F 61 2.5 (85%) 11.6 (63%) 0.132 14.9 0.74 0.35 13.4
13 M 68 1.9 (49%) 11.6 (48%) 0.211 19.9 0.29 0.36 5.8
14 M 70 4.3 (99%) 17.0 (72%) 0.143 13.9 0.48 0.16 8.5
15 M 62 2.7 (53%) 16.1 (60%) 0.230 16.1 0.26 0.28 4.7
16 F 67 1.6 (74%) 8.4 (51%) 0.114 17.2 0.37 0.30 6.7
17 M 67 3.0 (71%) 14.6 (58%) 0.283 6.3 0.18 0.14 1.2
18 M 69 3.6 (76%) 13.6 (53%) 0.284 20.5 0.22 0.25 4.4
19 M 75 2.3 (54%) 11.4 (48%) 0.164 18.0 0.17 0.24 4.8
Mean 66.1 2.7 (72.8%) 12.4 (53.2%) 0.185 16.8 0.43 0.30 7.7
SD 5.6 0.9 (18.1%) 3.3 (12.8%) 0.070 5.2 0.33 0.15 5.6