Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 18;100(4):1005–1012. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0632

Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics of respondents and households

Characteristic Baseline survey End line survey PR (95% CI)*
Number of households surveyed 1,204 1,170
Age (years)
 < 20 9.9% (116/1,173) 9.1% (103/1,134) 0.92 (0.71–1.18)
 20–35 71.6% (840/1,173) 67.9% (770/1,134) 0.95 (0.89–1.00)
 > 35 18.5% (217/1,173) 23.0% (261/1,134) 1.24 (1.06–1.46)
Highest level of education
 No education 10.2% (123/1,204) 10.8% (126/1,170) 1.05 (0.83–1.33)
 Primary 67.4% (812/1,204) 65.8% (770/1,170) 0.98 (0.92–1.03)
 Secondary 21.8% (263/1,204) 22.8% (267/1,170) 1.04 (0.90–1.21)
 College and higher 0.5% (6/1,204) 0.6% (7/1,170) 1.20 (0.40–3.56)
Main occupation
 Housewife 3.2% (38/1,201) 4.4% (52/1,169) 1.40 (0.93–2.12)
 Farmer 87.1% (1,046/1,201) 80.6% (942/1,169) 0.93 (0.89–0.96)
 Business/self-employed 4.9% (59/1,201) 10.2% (119/1,169) 2.07 (1.53–2.80)
 Civil servant 0.6% (7/1,201) 0.3% (4/1,169) 0.59 (0.17–2.00)
 Unemployed 1.9% (23/1,201) 1.6% (19/1,169) 0.85 (0.46–1.55)
 Others* 2.3% (28/1,201) 2.8% (33/1,169) 1.21 (0.74–1.99)
Marital status
 Single/not married 9.1% (109/1,203) 7.8% (91/1,169) 0.86 (0.66–1.12)
 Married 82.0% (986/1,203) 81.7% (955/1,169 0.99 (0.96–1.04)
 Separated/divorced 6.4% (77/1,203) 6.7% (78/1,169) 1.04 (0.77–1.41)
 Widowed 2.6% (31/1,203) 3.8% (45/1,169) 1.49 (0.95–2.34)
Ethnic group/tribe affiliation
 Bemba 27.1% (323/1,192) 25.9% (302/1,167) 0.96 (0.83–1.09)
 Tonga 17.4% (208/1,192) 16.7% (195/1,167) 0.96 (0.80–1.14)
 Tumbuka 6.8% (81/1,192) 6.8% (79/1,167) 0.99 (0.74–1.34)
 Lozi 4.2% (50/1,192) 6.0% (70/1,167) 1.43 (1.00–2.04)
 Others 44.5% (530/1,192) 44.6% (521/1,167) 1.00 (0.92–1.10)
Head of household
 Respondent 11.3% (136/1,203) 13.4% (156/1,168) 1.18 (0.95–1.47)
 Husband/partner 81.1% (976/1,203) 77.3% (903/1,168) 0.95 (0.91–0.99)
 Female relative 3.7% (45/1,203) 5.0% (58/1,168) 1.32 (0.90–1.94)
 Male relative 3.8% (46/1,203) 4.4% (51/1,168) 1.14 (0.77–1.69)
Household size (persons)
 < 4 17.8% (214/1,204) 14.1% (165/1,168) 0.79 (0.66–0.96)
 4–6 47.3% (569/1,204) 48.8% (570/1,168) 1.03 (0.95–1.12)
 > 6 35.0% (421/1,204) 37.1% (433/1,168) 1.06 (0.95–1.18)
Water sources
 Improved (protected) water source 34.7% (418/1,204) 51.9% (607/1,170) 1.50 (1.36–1.65)
Water treatment
 Use adequate water treatment method 32.3% (389/1,204) 24.6% (288/1,170) 0.76 (0.67–0.87)

Prevalence ratios presented in bold are all significant at P < 0.05.

* Prevalence ratio (PR) was calculated as the ratio of end line to baseline.