Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2019 Jan 30;316:12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.01.009

Table 2:

DDA spindle detection performance on all recordings

Subject Channel A′ F1 False
discovery rate		 False
negative rate
L1 11 0.6023 0.2685 0.5323 0.8117
L2 11 0.6934 0.2991 0.7107 0.6903
L3 11 0.7423 0.2892 0.4701 0.8011
L4 11 0.7784 0.4948 0.5590 0.4365
L5 11 0.7529 0.3679 0.6682 0.5872
Laminar mean 0.7139 0.3439 0.5881 0.6654
S1 1 (RCIN3) 0.8785 0.5404 0.5924 0.1983
S1 2 (LCIN4) 0.9066 0.7685 0.2340 0.2290
S1 3 (LSF6) 0.8716 0.4345 0.6953 0.2428
S2 1 (LCIN3) 0.9120 0.3464 0.0380 0.7887
S2 2 (LSF3) 0.9170 0.5410 0.0265 0.6254
S2 3 (RCIN5) 0.8514 0.5601 0.1723 0.5768
S2 4 (LFR1) 0.9262 0.3970 0.0386 0.7499
S3 1 (OF7) 0.9062 0.8211 0.1718 0.1858
*S4 1 (RPF5) 0.4886 0.0749 0.8372 0.9514
S4 2 (ROF4) 0.8421 0.7201 0.1541 0.3731
S5 1 (RAF6) 0.8186 0.6290 0.3222 0.4133
sEEG mean 0.8830 0.5758 0.2445 0.4383
E1 1 (GR28) 0.8385 0.6081 0.3954 0.3884
*E1 2 (GR53) 0.6254 0.0462 0.9722 0.8636
E1 3 (GR38) 0.7726 0.5128 0.4000 0.5522
E2 1 (AGR52) 0.8112 0.3478 0.7692 0.2941
sEEG mean 0.8074 0.4896 0.5215 0.4116
*

These recordings are excluded from the means and further analysis due to poor quality.