Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 23;103(7):3025–3035. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-09694-2

Table 1.

Summary of process parameters and performance during the propagation of CR.pIX cells for all analyzed cultivations

Cultivation Working volume [mL] Hollow fiber module Initial VCD [106 cells/mL] μmean [1/h] μmax [1/h] Actual average CSPR [nL/(cell × day)] Duration [h]***
MVA-CR19 virus
 Perfusion* 800 500 kDa 0.8 0.019 (n = 12, SD = 0.005) 0.026 0.057 (n = 24, SD = 0.006) 247
 Hybrid 1 600 0.65 μm 1.0 0.021 (n = 12, SD = 0.006) 0.029 0.068 (n = 18, SD = 0.013) 191
 Hybrid 2 600 0.20 μm 8.0 0.024 (n = 4, SD = 0.005) 0.031 0.057 (n = 7, SD = 0.011) 50
Influenza A virus
 Perfusion 800 500 kDa 1.0 0.017 (n = 18, SD = 0.011) 0.055 0.072 (n = 24, SD = 0.010) 183
 Hybrid 600 0.65 μm 1.0 0.019 (n = 7, SD = 0.004) 0.025 0.119 (n = 20, SD = 0.061)** 168
 Batch 800 NA 0.8 0.020 (n = 6, SD = 0.009) 0.033 NA 82

*Vazquez-Ramirez et al. (2018)

**Non-constant CSPR: perfusion rates were automatically adjusted to maintain the pH at a set point of 7.2 and not based on the actual viable cell densities

***Time from cells inoculation to infection