Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 3;9:5577. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41463-z

Table 1.

The incidence of black root rot disease under drought and combined stress treatments in two different locations of field trial from the year 2014 to 2018*.

Treatment 2014-15 2015-16 2016-2017 2017-2018
Field-1 Field-1 Field-2 Field-1 Field-2 Field-1 Field-2
Control 4.167a 1.938a 8.571a 0.625a 35.14a 0a 11.588a
Mild DS 9.167ab 2.908a 9.524ab 1.78ab 47.98bc 10.041bc 14.52ab
Moderate DS 10b 3.531a 9.524ab 6.78bc 56.48de 11.968cd 25.906cd
Severe DS 14.167bc 7.9c 10.476ab 8.96c 63.29ef 15.641de 31.824de
Pathogen 10b 3.851ab 9.048ab 1.11a 42.85ab 6.2723b 19.885bc
Mild CS 15.833c 6.544bc 11.905ab 6.81bc 54.73cd 10.597bc 20.56bc
Moderate CS 24.167d 7.151c 12.857ab 7.51c 65.59f 19.111ef 27.97de
Severe CS 26.667d 14.123d 16.667b 18.6d 66.36f 20.46f 35.203e
Grand mean 14.271 5.9932 11.071 6.5243 54.057 11.761 23.433
CV 16.18 19.8 41.7 35.46 8.29 15.71 17.66
LSD at p  < 0.05 5.4604 2.8066 8.0858 5.4711 7.8507 4.3702 7.2458

*Data represents percent BRR incidence in chickpea field location 1 and 2. Average of 2-3 block replicates are represented here. RCBD two-way ANOVA was used for the comparison of means of each field experiment and significance was assessed by the least significant difference (LSD at p < 0.05) post hoc test. Statistics are performed column-wise. Different letters (a, b, c, d, e, f) in a column denote significant difference in mean at p < 0.05. DS = drought stress; CS = combined stress; CV = coefficient of variance; LSD = least significant difference; Field location-1 = NIPGR, New Delhi; Field location-2 = GKVK, Bengaluru. Data shows an increase in the BRR incidence under severe CS and severe DS treatments compared to pathogen treatment and control.