Table 3.
McGill Qualitative Methodological Quality Criteria
Study | 1.1. Source relevance | 1.2. Process relevance | 1.3. Content relevance | 1.4. Researcher influence | Scoring (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Choi et al. [13] (2015) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 100 |
Crowe et al. [17] (2016) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 75 |
Goodman [14] (2016) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 75 |
Hipolito-Delgado et al. [9] (2011) | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | 75 |
Ishii et al. [8] (2009) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 100 |
Peiying et al. [12] (2012) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 75 |
Prosek and Michel [16] (2016) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 100 |
Shannonhouse et al. [15] (2015) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 100 |
Smith-Augustine et al. [11] (2014) | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | 75 |