Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 4;17(5):3307–3316. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7337

Table I.

Summary of pyrosequencing data.

Sample_ID Sequence_no. OTUs Filtered OTUs Shannon_index ACE_index Chao1_index Coverage Simpon
RM_control1 34948 447 37322 1.2204 641.11437 580.913043 0.994964 0.56009
RM_control2 39002 463 41410 0.421023 1672.661269 971.683544 0.992718 0.905217
RM_control3 36163 551 38664 0.883533 885.603703 787.014925 0.993032 0.717632
RM_control4 38540 336 39876 0.384966 448.529403 407.90625 0.996938 0.919171
RM_control5 33366 637 35693 1.586938 874.401789 812.506329 0.992927 0.478691
RM_control6 38787 377 39998 1.193842 691.127976 618.325 0.994921 0.460157
RM_control7 33174 421 34615 1.90784 639.519629 559.125 0.994876 0.282237
RM_control8 38476 604 40815 0.605582 1702.873689 1098.161017 0.991111 0.872647
RM_control9 38193 418 40387 0.349364 1476.004523 827.296296 0.993245 0.927695
RM_control10 39055 556 41136 0.430429 1525.391993 1033.097087 0.99196 0.913746
RM_case1 38861 530 40899 0.47373 1411.786593 889.486486 0.992718 0.901358
RM_case2 37973 495 39464 0.969683 688.77094 613.106383 0.995181 0.737364
RM_case3 32766 659 34398 2.121407 1435.948065 1057.649635 0.989898 0.263954
RM_case4 38107 633 40429 0.559294 1226.25393 1100.12782 0.990737 0.882253
RM_case5 36180 553 37780 0.964259 1496.239405 983 0.99168 0.62994
RM_case6 39523 692 42178 0.492288 1817.054442 1243.338129 0.990082 0.904096
RM_case7 34778 478 36739 1.20537 766.093643 675.280992 0.993703 0.446528
RM_case8 39885 510 41821 0.325184 1492.01625 904.345794 0.992704 0.94037
RM_case9 39854 537 41768 0.576914 1407.226829 936.794393 0.992648 0.866492
RM_case10 38340 609 41200 0.486695 1252.493401 1152.128205 0.990689 0.900224

The OTU, Chao I, Shannon and Simpon data were calculated at a 3% distance. RM_case, disease group; RM control, control group; OTUs, operational taxonomic units; ACE, abundance-based coverage estimators.