Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 4;110(4):1352–1363. doi: 10.1111/cas.13967

Table 2.

Characteristics of CLDN18‐ARHGAP‐positive and ‐negative tumors in patients with gastric cancer

Negative (n = 124) Positive (n = 22) P value
Sex, n (%)
Male 63 (50.8) 8 (36.4) .252
Female 61 (49.2) 14 (63.6)
Location of primary tumor, n (%)
Upper third 38 (30.6) 3 (13.6) .168
Middle third 55 (44.4) 10 (45.5)
Lower third 31 (25.0) 9 (40.9)
Lauren classification, n (%)
Intestinal 10 (8.1) 0 (0.0) .360
Diffuse 114 (91.9) 22 (100.0)
Gross appearance, n (%)
Early 64 (51.6) 8 (36.4) .169
Type 2 10 (8.1) 0 (0.0)
Type 3 30 (24.2) 10 (45.5)
Type 4 17 (13.7) 3 (13.6)
Others 3 (2.4) 1 (4.5)
Tumor size (cm)
10< 20 (16.1) 8 (36.4) .038
≤10 104 (83.9) 14 (63.6)
Depth of invasion, n (%)
m/sm 51 (41.1) 5 (22.7) .121
mp 17 (13.7) 1 (4.5)
ss 16 (12.9) 5 (22.7)
se/si 40 (32.3) 11 (50.0)
LN metastasis, n (%)
Absent 72 (58.1) 4 (18.2) <.001
Present 52 (41.9) 18 (81.8)
Stage (JGCA 14th edition)
Stage I/II 85 (68.5) 6 (27.3) <.001
Stage III/IV 39 (26.7) 16 (72.7)

Patients with fusion had more association with large tumor, metastatic lymph nodes (LNs), and advanced stage.

JGCA, Japanese Gastric Cancer Association m, mucosa; mp, muscularis propria; se, tumor penetration of serosa; si, tumor invasion of adjacent structures; sm, submucosa; ss, subserosa.