Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 5;110(4):1464–1479. doi: 10.1111/cas.13968

Table 1.

Summary of a pilot study to compare the capability of the junction capture method to detect fusion genes with that of a gDNA capture method

Case # Diagnosis Sample year RIN score Fusion gene TOP RNA panel (junction capture) gDNA capture Anchored multiplex PCR
Split read number Raw read number TOP version Split read number Raw read number Split read number Raw read number
#1 NSCLC 2012 N.D. EML4‐ALK 232 28 873 868 V1 12 53 647 702 68 1 941 324
#2 NSCLC 2012 N.D. EML4‐ALK 284 29 302 268 V1 108 61 299 256 22 2 354 508
#3 NSCLC 2013 N.D. EML4‐ALK 180 29 903 016 V1 44 58 450 392 10 2 639 006
#4 NSCLC 2014 N.D. EML4‐ALK 4179 30 546 206 V1 0 66 769 928 278 3 019 450
#5 NSCLC 2012 N.D. KIF5B‐RET 514 27 969 576 V1 0 57 830 964 0 54 170 756
#6 NSCLC 2013 N.D. KIF5B‐RET 2898 27 396 626 V1 150 69 819 612 0 58 501 738
#7 NSCLC 2014 1.3 KIF5B‐RET 1189 27 750 096 V1 53 62 606 194 5 65 226 738
#8 NSCLC 2011 N.D. SLC34A2‐ROS1 1633 30 614 778 V1 17 64 415 016 13 45 395 450
#9 NSCLC 2012 1.4 CD74‐ROS1 5268 29 494 774 V1 0 60 541 260 0 53 252 448
#10 NSCLC 2013 N.D. CD74‐ROS1 2491 28 970 804 V1 77 69 241 262 0 56 481 374

N.D., not detected; NSCLC, non‐small‐cell lung cancer; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RIN, RNA integrity number.