Table 2.
Statistical comparisons for benchmark feature-learnability and ML approaches (Figure 2).
| Statistical comparison | p-value | Significance | Test | Figure | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | WIA Side (left vs. right) | 0.167 | Two-way ANOVA | 2A | |
| B | WIA Nerve (sural vs. peroneal) | 0.474 | Two-way ANOVA | 2A | |
| C | WIA Peroneal bilateral nerve pair (LPN vs. RPN) | 0.921 | Two-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD post hoc | 2A | |
| D | WIA Sural bilateral nerve pair (LSN vs. RSN) | 0.521 | Two-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD post hoc | 2A | |
| E | WIA Different ipsilateral nerve (LPN vs. LSN) | 0.81 | Two-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD post hoc | 2A | |
| F | WIA Different ipsilateral nerve (RPN vs. RSN) | 0.999 | Two-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD post hoc | 2A | |
| G | WIA vs. PP | 0.7 | One-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD post hoc | 2A,B | |
| H | WIA vs. LOO | 0.023 | ∗ | One-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD post hoc | 2A,C |
| I | PP vs. LOO | 0.066 | • | One-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD post hoc | 2B,C |
LOO, leave-one-out; LPN, left peroneal nerve; LSN, left sural nerve; PP, pooled population; RPN, right peroneal nerve; RSN, right sural nerve; WIA, within individual animal. •p < 0.1, ∗p < 0.05.