Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 19;20(4):91–98. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12566

Table 5.

The P‐values from plan to plan comparisons of the rectal metrics

Treatment plans RV60 Gy RV55 Gy RV50 Gy RV46 Gy RV37 Gy
Pre_IMRT CRW_IMRT 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.007
Pre_IMRT RW_IMRT 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
CRW_IMRT RW_IMRT 0.890 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.019
Pre_VMAT CRW_VMAT 0.006 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Pre_VMAT RW_VMAT 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
CRW_VMAT RW_VMAT 0.859 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Pre_IMRT Pre_VMAT 0.917 0.650 0.807 0.650 0.033
CRW_IMRT CRW_VMAT 0.139 0.814 0.917 0.917 0.039
RW_IMRT RW_VMAT 0.091 0.594 0.807 0.553 0.753

CRW: composite rectum wall; IMRT: intensity modulated radiotherapy; RW: rectal wall; VMAT: volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Bold values indicate statistical significance below the threshhold of P < 0.01.