Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 28;20(4):29–44. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12556

Table 4.

Comparison of 3σ values based on 202 sets of measurements with tolerance threshold from published literature

Daily QA tests 3σ based on control charts Threshold from published literature
Dose output ±0.7% ±1%8, ±2%5, 6, 9, ±3%4
Field homogeneity ±0.5% ±2%9
Distal range ±0.3 mm ±0.5 mm8, ±1 mm4, 5, ±2 mm6, 7, 9
Proximal range ±0.3 mm ±2 mm9
Width ±0.2 mm Not available
Distal‐fall‐off (mm) 0 mm for E106 Not available
±0.1 mm for E145, E172 & E221
Beam coincidence X ±0.7 mm ±1.5 mm5, ±2 mm9
Beam coincidence Y ±0.5 mm
Spot position X ±0.6 mm ±1 mm7, ±1.5 mm5, 8, ±2 mm6, 9
Spot position Y ±0.4 mm
In‐air spot sigma X ±0.9% for E106 ±10%5, 9, ±15%7
±1.7% for E145
±1.9% for E172
±2.1% for E221
In‐air spot sigma Y ±1.1% for E106
±2.0% for E145
±2.7% for E172
±3.6% for E221
Skewness X ±0.2 for E106 Not available
±0.3 for E145, E172 & E221
Skewness Y ±0.2 for E106 & E145
±0.3 for E172 & E221
PPS translational ±0.8 mm for lateral (X) ±1 mm4, 5, 8, 9
±0.6 mm for longitudinal (Y) and vertical (Z)
PPS rotational ±0.3° for pitch and roll Not available
±0.2° for yaw