Table 5.
Some challenges faced by the module committee during module implementation in two academic years
| Year | Challenge | Intervention |
|---|---|---|
| 2012-2013 | Inappropriateness of the teaching method to the LOs of some patient safety topic reported by students and reflected on their learning | Changing teaching mode of some lectures to practical sessions) (e.g., hospital safety and disaster medicine) |
| Learning resources were difficult to be accessed by the students | Improving the website of the module with more learning resources | |
| Activating the learning management system (LMS) Utilize more social media | ||
| Upload the module lectures on the website | ||
| Assessment strategies needs improvement. | Introducing e-exams | |
| Separation of the module from the internal medicine course as was requested by the students | Discussed with Phase II committee and unfortunately it was rejected | |
| 2015-2016 | Involvement of a few number of teaching faculty in offering the module | Diverse faculty members from different specialties and background as well as some administrative staff with expertise in patient safety were added to participate in module teaching |
| Inconsistency in evaluation of students’ projects | Adding objective peer evaluation to be a part of the safety project evaluation | |
| To use a standardized checklist for project evaluation | ||
| To invite external evaluators for the evaluation of the projects to improve the assessment | ||
| Improvement of the quality of students’ assessment | Adding more questions to the item bank | |
| Revising and ensure sticking to the blueprint | ||
| Conducting formative assessment with feedback given to students on their projects, and students with difficulty were counselled by module coordinator | ||
| Separate the module from the internal medicine course | Discussed with Phase II committee and approval was obtained |