1.30. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Peer support + standard care versus standard care alone, Outcome 30 Functioning: 5. Specific: contact with justice system – criminal justice charges (skewed data).

Functioning: 5. Specific: contact with justice system – criminal justice charges (skewed data)
Study	Intervention	Mean	SD	N
Felony (counts of criminal justice charges, high = more criminal charges) ‐– medium term
Rowe 2007	peer support	0.19	0.46	73
Rowe 2007	standard care	0.10	0.49	41
Felony (counts of criminal justice charges, high = more criminal charges) – long term
Rowe 2007	peer support	0.10	0.30	73
Rowe 2007	standard care	0.02	0.16	41
Infraction (counts of criminal justice charges, high = more criminal charges) – medium term
Rowe 2007	peer support	0.08	0.28	73
Rowe 2007	standard care	0.15	0.48	41
Infraction (counts of criminal justice charges, high = more criminal charges) – long term
Rowe 2007	peer support	0.05	0.23	73
Rowe 2007	standard care	0.00	0.00	41
Misdemeanour (counts of criminal justice charges, high = more criminal charges) – medium term
Rowe 2007	peer support	0.89	1.50	73
Rowe 2007	standard care	0.46	1.03	41
Misdemeanour (counts of criminal justice charges, high = more criminal charges) – long term
Rowe 2007	peer support	0.53	1.30	73
Rowe 2007	standard care	0.27	0.63	41
Total charges (counts of criminal justice charges, high = more criminal charges) – medium term
Rowe 2007	peer support	1.18	1.87	73
Rowe 2007	standard care	0.76	1.50	41
Total charges (counts of criminal justice charges, high = more criminal charges) – long term
Rowe 2007	peer support	0.75	1.71	73
Rowe 2007	standard care	0.32	0.76	41
Violation (counts of criminal justice charges, high = more criminal charges) ‐– medium term
Rowe 2007	peer support	0.01	0.12	73
Rowe 2007	standard care	0.05	0.22	41
Violation (counts of criminal justice charges, high = more criminal charges) – long term
Rowe 2007	peer support	0.07	0.30	73
Rowe 2007	standard care	0.02	0.16	41