Summary of findings 2. Peer support plus standard care versus clinician‐led support plus standard care for people with schizophrenia or similar serious mental illness.
Peer support + standard care vs clinician‐led support + standard care for people with schizophrenia or similar serious mental illness | ||||||
Patient or population: people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness Settings: inpatients and outpatients Intervention: peer support + standard care vs clinician‐led support + standard care | ||||||
Outcomes | Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | No of participants (studies) | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
Assumed risk | Corresponding risk | |||||
Control | Peer support vsclinician‐led support | |||||
Service use: hospital admission | Data not available for this outcome | |||||
Service use: days in hospital | Data not available for this outcome | |||||
Global state: relapse | Data not available for this outcome | |||||
Global state: clinically important change in global state | Data not available for this outcome | |||||
Peer outcomes: clinically important change in quality of life for service user and peer supporter | Data not available for this outcome | |||||
Adverse events: all cause | Data not available for this outcome | |||||
Economic: indirect costs (cost to society) | Data not available for this outcome | |||||
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: confidence interval. | ||||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect. Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate. |