Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 4;2019(4):CD010880. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010880.pub2

Summary of findings 2. Peer support plus standard care versus clinician‐led support plus standard care for people with schizophrenia or similar serious mental illness.

Peer support + standard care vs clinician‐led support + standard care for people with schizophrenia or similar serious mental illness
Patient or population: people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness
Settings: inpatients and outpatients
Intervention: peer support + standard care vs clinician‐led support + standard care
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Control Peer support vsclinician‐led support
Service use: hospital admission Data not available for this outcome
Service use: days in hospital Data not available for this outcome
Global state: relapse Data not available for this outcome
Global state: clinically important change in global state Data not available for this outcome
Peer outcomes: clinically important change in quality of life for service user and peer supporter Data not available for this outcome
Adverse events: all cause Data not available for this outcome
Economic: indirect costs (cost to society) Data not available for this outcome
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.