Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 4;2019(4):CD010880. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010880.pub2

Comparison 3. Sensitivity analysis (assumptions for lost binary data): peer support + standard care versus standard care.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Service use: 1. Hospital admission – medium term 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Without intention‐to‐treat (ITT) 1 19 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.44 [0.11, 1.75]
1.2 With ITT 1 25 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.55 [0.18, 1.64]